Ackroyd N, Lane R, Dart L, Appleberg M
Aust N Z J Surg. 1985 Apr;55(2):181-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1985.tb00881.x.
Fluid filled oculoplethysmography (OPG) is a widely used method of assessing carotid stenosis but it has limitations in the detection of bilateral internal carotid artery lesions and of external carotid artery stenoses. In this study, 157 consecutive patients having carotid angiography and fluid filled OPG were assessed to determine the accuracy of the technique and define the sources of error. Haemodynamically significant stenosis (HDS) was defined as at least 50% stenosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA). Only the most severely stenosed side of the 35 bilateral HDS lesions was detected owing to the poor reliability of ear pulse delays. Eye/eye delays alone detected the most severely stenosed side in 82 of 98 patients with an HDS stenosis of one or both ICAs for a sensitivity of 84% a specificity of 71% (41/59) and accuracy of 79% (81/157). The measurement of ear/ear pulse delays for external carotid artery (ECA) stenosis had a sensitivity of only 15% (5/34). Ear/eye pulse delays detected none of the 35 patients with bilateral HDS ICA stenosis. Bilateral equal HDS ICA stenoses were a significant source of error. Stenotic disease was present in the aortic arch and branches (five patients) or the carotid siphon (eight patients) and in seven cases it resulted in an incorrect localization on OPG. There was no diagnostic relationship between the severity of delay and the presence of total occlusion. Chronic local eye pathology was present in 13 patients and did not affect the results of the OPG. We have ceased to use ear pulse measurements for routine assessment but continue to use the eye/eye delays in conjunction with a carotid doppler imaging system.
液体填充式眼体积描记法(OPG)是一种广泛用于评估颈动脉狭窄的方法,但在检测双侧颈内动脉病变和颈外动脉狭窄方面存在局限性。在本研究中,对157例连续接受颈动脉血管造影和液体填充式OPG检查的患者进行评估,以确定该技术的准确性并明确误差来源。血流动力学显著狭窄(HDS)定义为颈内动脉(ICA)至少50%的狭窄。由于耳脉搏延迟的可靠性较差,在35例双侧HDS病变中仅检测到最严重狭窄的一侧。对于98例一侧或双侧ICA存在HDS狭窄的患者,仅通过眼/眼延迟检测到了82例中最严重狭窄的一侧,敏感性为84%,特异性为71%(41/59),准确性为79%(81/157)。对于颈外动脉(ECA)狭窄,测量耳/耳脉搏延迟的敏感性仅为15%(5/34)。在35例双侧HDS ICA狭窄患者中,耳/眼脉搏延迟未检测到任何病例。双侧相等的HDS ICA狭窄是一个重要的误差来源。主动脉弓及其分支(5例患者)或颈动脉虹吸部(8例患者)存在狭窄性疾病,在7例病例中导致OPG定位错误。延迟的严重程度与完全闭塞的存在之间没有诊断关系。13例患者存在慢性局部眼部病变,但未影响OPG的结果。我们已停止使用耳脉搏测量进行常规评估,但继续将眼/眼延迟与颈动脉多普勒成像系统结合使用。