Suppr超能文献

与噪声性听力损失相关的声反射阈值。

The acoustic reflex threshold in relation to noise-induced hearing loss.

作者信息

Lindgren F, Nilsson R, Axelsson A

出版信息

Scand Audiol. 1983;12(1):49-55. doi: 10.3109/01050398309076224.

Abstract

In 100 consecutive cases with severe noise-induced hearing loss, pure-tone threshold measurements revealed symmetric hearing losses with maximum shifts at 4000 and 6000 Hz. Acoustic reflex measurements showed that few patients had an elevated pathologic reflex threshold. In contrast, we found a depressed acoustic reflex sensation level (i.e., the difference, in decibels, between pure-tone threshold and acoustic reflex threshold) suggesting a cochlear localization of the injury. Consequently, the probability of retro-cochlear involvement was small, or the cochlear component dominated the retro-cochlear one. The relation between the absence of the acoustic reflex and the degree of hearing loss showed that even at a pure-tone threshold of 80 dB HL, 50% of the ears still had an elicitable acoustic reflex. Statistical analysis yielded a significant correlation between acoustic reflex sensation level and speech discrimination, but no such correlation between acoustic reflex threshold and speech discrimination. We suggest that acoustic reflex sensation level should be a complement to the acoustic reflex threshold in order to distinguish between different localizations of sensorineural hearing losses.

摘要

在100例连续性重度噪声性听力损失患者中,纯音阈值测量显示听力损失呈对称性,最大听力偏移出现在4000Hz和6000Hz处。声反射测量显示,仅有少数患者的病理性反射阈值升高。相反,我们发现声反射感觉级降低(即纯音阈值与声反射阈值之间以分贝为单位的差值),提示损伤位于耳蜗。因此,蜗后受累的可能性较小,或者耳蜗成分在蜗后成分中占主导地位。声反射缺失与听力损失程度之间的关系表明,即使在纯音阈值为80dB HL时,仍有50%的耳可引出声反射。统计分析结果显示,声反射感觉级与言语辨别力之间存在显著相关性,但声反射阈值与言语辨别力之间不存在此类相关性。我们认为,声反射感觉级应作为声反射阈值的补充,以区分感音神经性听力损失的不同定位。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验