Merkel W T, Nierenberg B P
Soc Sci Med. 1983;17(4):213-7. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(83)90118-1.
Although behavioral science training is an essential component of family practice residency education, there have been few evaluations of its effects. In this study, selected behaviors of senior residents and their patients in two different family practice residency programs were compared. One program emphasized behavioral science, the other did not. Residents in the more behaviorally oriented program had more positive attitudes toward both social factors in illness and the importance of a warm physician-patient relationship. In addition, these residents claimed to know more about non-pharmacologic treatments for depression and anxiety and felt more confident in their ability to handle them than their less behaviorally trained counterparts. In regard to patient care, patients of residents in the program which emphasized behavioral science were more likely to receive a psychosocial diagnosis and resident counseling or mental health referral than patients of residents in the program which did not. On a patient satisfaction questionnaire, patients of the two programs differed on only one subscale which concerned convenience of care. Although these early results are encouraging, behavioral science training needs continuing clarification and evaluation of its goals and accomplishments.
尽管行为科学培训是家庭医学住院医师教育的重要组成部分,但对其效果的评估却很少。在本研究中,比较了两个不同家庭医学住院医师项目中高年级住院医师及其患者的特定行为。一个项目强调行为科学,另一个则不强调。行为导向性更强的项目中的住院医师对疾病中的社会因素以及温暖医患关系的重要性都有更积极的态度。此外,这些住院医师声称比行为科学培训较少的同行更了解抑郁症和焦虑症的非药物治疗方法,并且对自己处理这些问题的能力更有信心。在患者护理方面,与未强调行为科学的项目中的住院医师的患者相比,强调行为科学的项目中的住院医师的患者更有可能接受心理社会诊断以及住院医师咨询或心理健康转诊。在一份患者满意度调查问卷上,两个项目的患者仅在一个涉及护理便利性的子量表上存在差异。尽管这些早期结果令人鼓舞,但行为科学培训仍需要持续明确并评估其目标和成果。