Grosvenor T, Perrigin D M, Perrigin J
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1983 Mar;60(3):224-35. doi: 10.1097/00006324-198303000-00010.
Previous studies involving the American Optical SR-III Subjective Refraction System have indicated that refractive data for adults and for populations of mixed age groups compare favorably with conventional refractive data. However, no data concerning children, as a group, have been available. As a part of a 3-year Myopia Control Study being conducted at the University of Houston, 131 myopes between the ages of 6 and 15 years have been refracted by means of both the redesigned SR-IV Programmed Subjective Refractor and conventional clinical procedures. The results indicated that for the majority of subjects, the refractive data obtained by means of the SR-IV differed by no more than 0.25 D from data obtained by conventional procedures. SR-IV and clinical refractive data were also compared for a group of 30 second year optometry students, and agreement for the two methods was found to compare favorably with agreement of clinical refractive data obtained by two or more examiners.
此前涉及美国光学SR - III主观验光系统的研究表明，成人以及混合年龄组人群的屈光数据与传统屈光数据相比具有优势。然而，尚无关于儿童群体的相关数据。作为休斯顿大学正在进行的一项为期3年的近视控制研究的一部分，131名年龄在6至15岁之间的近视患者通过重新设计的SR - IV程序化主观验光仪和传统临床程序进行了验光。结果表明，对于大多数受试者而言，通过SR - IV获得的屈光数据与通过传统程序获得的数据相差不超过0.25屈光度。还对一组30名二年级验光专业学生的SR - IV和临床屈光数据进行了比较，发现这两种方法的一致性与由两名或更多检查者获得的临床屈光数据的一致性相比具有优势。
