Suppr超能文献

老年学研究中常用的各种关联强度测量方法的比较。

A comparison of various strength of association measures commonly used in gerontological research.

作者信息

Camp C J, Maxwell S E

出版信息

J Gerontol. 1983 Jan;38(1):3-7. doi: 10.1093/geronj/38.1.3.

Abstract

An increased usage of measures of strength of association or effect size (ES) has been noted in the gerontological literature. Potential confusion could be generated by the fact that different researchers have reported different measures of ES from study to study. This paper involves a comparison of six ES measures commonly used by gerontological researchers as these measures relate to one another in both the analysis of variance and multiple regression models. Three other issues involving ES measures are discussed: (1) the ES of a contrast; (2) orthogonal and nonorthogonal designs; (3) partial Ess.

摘要

老年学文献中已注意到关联强度或效应量(ES)测量方法的使用有所增加。不同研究人员在不同研究中报告了不同的ES测量方法,这一事实可能会产生潜在的混淆。本文对老年学研究人员常用的六种ES测量方法进行了比较,因为这些测量方法在方差分析和多元回归模型中相互关联。还讨论了涉及ES测量的其他三个问题:(1)对比的ES;(2)正交和非正交设计;(3)偏效应量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验