Camp C J, Maxwell S E
J Gerontol. 1983 Jan;38(1):3-7. doi: 10.1093/geronj/38.1.3.
An increased usage of measures of strength of association or effect size (ES) has been noted in the gerontological literature. Potential confusion could be generated by the fact that different researchers have reported different measures of ES from study to study. This paper involves a comparison of six ES measures commonly used by gerontological researchers as these measures relate to one another in both the analysis of variance and multiple regression models. Three other issues involving ES measures are discussed: (1) the ES of a contrast; (2) orthogonal and nonorthogonal designs; (3) partial Ess.
老年学文献中已注意到关联强度或效应量(ES)测量方法的使用有所增加。不同研究人员在不同研究中报告了不同的ES测量方法,这一事实可能会产生潜在的混淆。本文对老年学研究人员常用的六种ES测量方法进行了比较,因为这些测量方法在方差分析和多元回归模型中相互关联。还讨论了涉及ES测量的其他三个问题:(1)对比的ES;(2)正交和非正交设计;(3)偏效应量。