Sanders R C, McNeil B J, Finberg H J, Hessel S J, Siegelman S S, Adams D F, Alderson P O, Abrams H L
Radiology. 1983 Feb;146(2):439-42. doi: 10.1148/radiology.146.2.6849090.
Findings from computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) examinations of 74 patients who were clinically thought to have pelvic masses and of 110 patients who had possible recurrence of pelvic tumors were analyzed. There was no significant difference in the ability of the two modalities to identify masses or to predict disease extent. Although both CT and US failed to detect some examples of spread outside of the pelvis, overstaging (apart from two cases of unconfirmed parametrial spread) did not occur with CT and occurred only once with US. The sensitivity was 0.96 for CT and 0.91 for US in the detection of pelvic masses. Both modalities had an accuracy of 0.81 in the detection of recurrent disease.
对74例临床诊断为盆腔肿块的患者以及110例可能存在盆腔肿瘤复发的患者进行了计算机断层扫描（CT）和超声（US）检查，并对检查结果进行了分析。在识别肿块或预测疾病范围方面，这两种检查方式的能力没有显著差异。尽管CT和US都未能检测到盆腔外扩散的一些病例，但CT未出现过度分期（除两例未确诊的宫旁组织扩散病例外），而US仅出现过一次过度分期。CT检测盆腔肿块的灵敏度为0.96，US为0.91。两种检查方式在检测复发性疾病方面的准确率均为0.81。
