Suppr超能文献

超声和计算机断层扫描对妇科盆腔肿块的评估

Evaluation of gynecologic pelvic masses by ultrasound and computed tomography.

作者信息

Sommer F G, Walsh J W, Schwartz P E, Viscomi G N, Jaffe C C, Taylor K J, Rosenfield A T

出版信息

J Reprod Med. 1982 Jan;27(1):45-50.

PMID:7097660
Abstract

In a prospective study, computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound scanning of the pelvis were performed for 50 patients having clinically suspected pelvic masses or recurrence of known pelvic malignancy. On the basis of these scan images, an attempt was made to characterize pelvic masses on the basis of benign or malignant character and organ of origin. The presence of recurrent tumor in patients previously treated for pelvic malignancy was assessed, and the presence of abdominal metastatic disease was evaluated for all patients. CT was successful in a higher proportion of cases in detecting abdominal metastatic disease due to bowel gas's degrading the abdominal ultrasound scan images. In characterizing suspected pelvic masses and evaluating the presence of recurrent tumor, both CT and ultrasound scanning were accurate in approximately two-thirds of cases. The significant proportion of incorrect results indicates that neither technique is sufficiently accurate to preclude pathologic diagnosis of a pelvic mass or to substitute for exploratory surgery to assess recurrence of pelvic malignancy.

摘要

在一项前瞻性研究中,对50例临床怀疑有盆腔肿块或已知盆腔恶性肿瘤复发的患者进行了骨盆的计算机断层扫描(CT)和超声扫描。基于这些扫描图像,试图根据良性或恶性特征以及起源器官对盆腔肿块进行特征描述。评估了先前接受盆腔恶性肿瘤治疗的患者中复发性肿瘤的存在情况,并对所有患者评估了腹部转移性疾病的存在情况。由于肠道气体使腹部超声扫描图像质量下降,CT在检测腹部转移性疾病的病例中成功率更高。在对疑似盆腔肿块进行特征描述以及评估复发性肿瘤的存在情况时,CT和超声扫描在大约三分之二的病例中都是准确的。相当比例的错误结果表明,这两种技术都不够准确,无法排除盆腔肿块的病理诊断,也不能替代探索性手术来评估盆腔恶性肿瘤的复发情况。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验