Suppr超能文献

[功能性呼吸功能不全的评估]

[Assessment of functional respiratory deficit].

作者信息

Sadoul P

出版信息

Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir. 1983 Jan-Feb;19(1):3-6.

PMID:6850145
Abstract

The numerous terms used to describe the physical limitations of a subject to carry out the same level of work as before his illness have brought about an unfortunate confusion. The assessment of respiratory impairment is the responsibility of the doctor, whereas the decision as to whether the patient may resume his previous employment is often that of someone in a legal capacity. Many meetings during the last 20 years have been devoted to the assessment of respiratory impairment. A SEPCR working group recently proposed a classification in 3 categories based on simple functional examinations. The use of this grading system by chest physicians responsible for the assessment of the respiratory impairment will make comparison of data easier. Taking into account other elements of evaluation will give an opportunity of validation of this grading system. An international scale would do away with the disparities of the present evaluation. This scale based solely on simple tests would be one of the elements in the determination of respiratory impairment, and the clinical data must not be forgotten. The radiological aspects are to be treated carefully since they provide only indirect information about the respiratory function. Spirography is not sufficient and a study of respiratory exchanges is needed for an accurate evaluation. Examinations whose results depend neither on the collaboration of the subject nor the predicted values obtained according to the morphology are preferable. For this reason, the examination of blood gases is of utmost importance, despite the criticisms made by some specialists. The cardio-respiratory responses during exercise provide a very useful element for assessment. If the physician in charge does not have at his disposal the equipment for maximal exercise tests, he can ask for a short walking test on level ground. The response to this test gives relative approximations, but it can nevertheless be used as a useful complement to results recorded at rest.

摘要

用于描述患病个体身体机能受限,无法像患病前那样完成同等工作水平的术语繁多,这造成了令人遗憾的混淆。呼吸功能损害的评估是医生的职责,而患者是否能够恢复之前工作的决定通常由具有法律身份的人做出。在过去20年里,许多会议都致力于呼吸功能损害的评估。一个欧洲呼吸学会(SEPCR)工作组最近基于简单的功能检查提出了一个分为三类的分类方法。负责评估呼吸功能损害的胸科医生使用这个分级系统将使数据比较更容易。考虑到其他评估因素将为验证这个分级系统提供机会。一个国际标准将消除目前评估中的差异。这个仅基于简单测试的标准将是确定呼吸功能损害的因素之一,而且临床数据也绝不能被忽视。放射学方面需要谨慎对待,因为它们仅提供有关呼吸功能的间接信息。肺量计检查并不足够,需要进行呼吸气体交换研究才能准确评估。那些结果既不依赖于受试者的配合,也不依赖于根据形态学获得的预测值的检查更可取。因此,尽管一些专家提出了批评,但血气检查至关重要。运动期间的心肺反应为评估提供了非常有用的依据。如果负责的医生没有进行最大运动测试的设备,他可以要求进行一次在平地上的短距离步行测试。对这个测试的反应给出相对近似值,但它仍然可以用作对静息时记录结果的有用补充。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验