Suppr超能文献

主动脉股动脉血管造影中造影剂的疼痛和热感比较:葡甲胺泛影酸盐(安吉奥格拉芬)与利多卡因混合液对比碘克沙醇(六溴双酚)。

Comparison of pain and heat sensation of contrast media in aortofemoral angiography: meglumine-amidotrizoate (Angiografin) mixed with lidocaine versus sodium-meglumine-ioxaglate (Hexabrix).

作者信息

Heystraten F M, van den Berg F G, Mulderije E D

出版信息

Diagn Imaging. 1983;52(2-3):141-4.

PMID:6851813
Abstract

A total of 116 translumbar aortofemoral angiograms were performed in 92 patients. At random, 58 contrast injections were done with Hexabrix and 58 with Angiografin mixed with lidocaine. Pain and heat sensation was evaluated by a verbal rating system. Most patients in both groups had no or mild pain sensation. There was, however, a slight but statistically significant difference (p less than 0.05) in favor of Hexabrix. No difference was found in heat sensation in either of the groups.

摘要

对92例患者共进行了116次经腰主动脉股动脉血管造影。随机对58例注射造影剂使用Hexabrix,另58例使用与利多卡因混合的泛影葡胺。通过言语评分系统评估疼痛和热感。两组中的大多数患者没有疼痛感觉或仅有轻微疼痛感觉。然而,在有利于Hexabrix方面存在轻微但具有统计学意义的差异(p小于0.05)。两组在热感方面均未发现差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验