Suppr超能文献

用于测定毛细血管血糖的5种反射仪的比较。

Comparison of 5 reflectance meters for capillary blood glucose determination.

作者信息

Kolopp M, Louis J, Pointel J P, Kohler F, Drouin P, Debry G

出版信息

Diabete Metab. 1983 Mar;9(1):19-25.

PMID:6852336
Abstract

Manufacturing quality, accuracy and users opinion (i.e. medical and nurses staff and patients) were compared among five Destrostix reading reflectance-meters for home-blood-glucose-monitoring. Two machines (dextrometer and glucometer) equipped with microprocessors, integrated circuits and good quality wiring are best made. Reflectance-meter capillary blood glucose measurements were found to be accurate enough for home-blood-glucose-monitoring, compared to a reference method. However, two machines from the same brand were different in blood glucose accuracy. Glucocheck had poorest results. Users prefer small sized, battery powered machines. Glucometer appears to be best suited to home-blood-glucose-monitoring.

摘要

对五款用于家庭血糖监测的Destrostix读数反射仪的制造质量、准确性以及用户意见(即医护人员和患者)进行了比较。两款配备微处理器、集成电路且布线质量良好的仪器(右旋糖仪和血糖仪)制造工艺最佳。与参考方法相比,发现反射仪测量毛细血管血糖对于家庭血糖监测来说足够准确。然而,同一品牌的两款仪器在血糖测量准确性上存在差异。Glucocheck的结果最差。用户更喜欢尺寸小、由电池供电的仪器。血糖仪似乎最适合家庭血糖监测。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验