Carlini M, Castellazzi R, Gamba Ansaldi S, Grassi G, Bruni B
Ann Osp Maria Vittoria Torino. 1982 Jul-Dec;25(7-12):226-34.
The accuracy of a new reflectance photometer, RapidGluco Italamec, intended for home blood glucose monitoring was compared with that of two other reflectometers, Glucocheck Medistron and Glucometer Ames, all using Dextrostix strips, and a routine laboratory method (Glucose Analyzer Beckman). Venous blood sugar values from 300 randomly selected patients attending our Clinic, obtained with each of the reflectometers (RapidGluco, Glucocheck, Glucometer), correlated significantly with those obtained with the Glucose Analyzer (r = 0.95, 0.99, 0.90; y = 1.06x + 3.29; y = 1.04x + 0.26; y = 0.87x + 34.8). The reflectometer - Dextrostix system proved accurate and convenient for practical purposes with all three instruments. Attention may be drawn to the lower cost of the RapidGluco. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the reliability of the system when used by patients themselves, the advantages of reflectometers over visual readings of the strips, and their improvement of diabetic control.
将一款用于家庭血糖监测的新型反射光度计RapidGluco Italamec的准确性,与另外两款反射光度计Glucocheck Medistron和血糖仪Ames进行了比较,这三款仪器均使用葡萄糖试纸条,同时还与常规实验室方法(贝克曼葡萄糖分析仪)进行了比较。从我们诊所随机选取300名患者,用每款反射光度计(RapidGluco、Glucocheck、血糖仪)获取静脉血糖值,这些值与用葡萄糖分析仪测得的值显著相关(r = 0.95、0.99、0.90;y = 1.06x + 3.29;y = 1.04x + 0.26;y = 0.87x + 34.8)。事实证明,对于实际应用而言,这三款仪器搭配葡萄糖试纸条的系统准确且方便。值得注意的是,RapidGluco成本较低。需要进行前瞻性研究,以评估该系统由患者自行使用时的可靠性、反射光度计相对于试纸条目视读数的优势,以及它们对糖尿病控制的改善情况。