Baranger M, Baranger W, Mom J
Int J Psychoanal. 1983;64 Pt 1:1-15.
The 'talking cure', named by Anna O. and discovered by Freud, has been widely expanded and diversified throughout our century. Our objective in this paper is to underline several points which seem to define the analytic process. We believe that forthcoming progress in psychoanalysis must arise from the study of clinical experience at its frontiers, at its topmost limits, in its failures. For this reason, we have concentrated our search on the analytic non-process, in the very places where the process stumbles or halts. This has led us to propose the introduction of several terms: 'field', 'bastion', 'second look'. When the process stumbles or halts, the analyst must question himself about the obstacle. The obstacle involves the analysand's transference and the analyst's countertransference, and poses rather confusing problems. The arrest of the process introduces us fully into the nature of its movement, its inherent temporality. If the process is to continue, then by what main-spring can we accomplish it? We describe this particular dialectic of processes and non-process as a task of overcoming the obstacles which describe its success or failure.
由安娜·O. 命名、弗洛伊德发现的“谈话疗法”，在整个世纪得到了广泛拓展和多样化发展。本文的目的是强调几个似乎能界定分析过程的要点。我们认为，精神分析未来的进展必须源于对其前沿、极限及失败之处的临床经验研究。因此，我们将研究重点集中在分析的非过程上，即在过程绊倒或停滞的地方。这使我们提出引入几个术语：“场域”“堡垒”“二次审视”。当过程绊倒或停顿时，分析师必须审视自身所面临的障碍。该障碍涉及受分析者的移情和分析师的反移情，且会引发相当令人困惑的问题。过程的停滞使我们充分了解其运动本质及内在时间性。若要使过程继续，我们靠什么主要动力来实现呢？我们将这种过程与非过程的特殊辩证法描述为一项克服障碍的任务，而这些障碍决定着其成败。
