Friedman G D
J Chronic Dis. 1983;36(5):367-70. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(83)90168-6.
It has been suggested that conflicting findings regarding rauwolfia drugs as predisposing factors for breast cancer can be explained by the hypothesis that use for a long duration predisposes to breast cancer occurring after age 50. In a follow-up study of 2077 women who received prescriptions for rauwolfia drugs there was no excess risk for breast cancer diagnosed at age 50 or greater (morbidity ratio = 0.9 compared to 1.0 expected). In comparing 35 patients in this age group with 168 women who received rauwolfia but remained free of breast cancer, there was no excess risk for long (greater than or equal to 5 yr) duration of use (relative risk = 0.9). Thus, the hypothesis could not be confirmed in this study group. It is likely that the excess risk among long-duration rauwolfia users, if present at all, is less than 2-fold.
有人提出,关于萝芙木属药物作为乳腺癌诱发因素的相互矛盾的研究结果,可以用这样一种假说来解释,即长期使用萝芙木属药物会增加50岁以后患乳腺癌的风险。在一项对2077名接受萝芙木属药物处方的女性的随访研究中,50岁及以上被诊断出患乳腺癌的风险并没有增加(发病率比为0.9,而预期为1.0)。在将该年龄组的35名患者与168名接受了萝芙木属药物治疗但未患乳腺癌的女性进行比较时,长期(大于或等于5年)使用药物并没有增加风险(相对风险为0.9)。因此,该假说在这个研究组中无法得到证实。长期使用萝芙木属药物的人群中,即便确实存在额外风险,其可能也不到两倍。