Mensink H J, Marrink J, Hindriks F R, van Zanten A K
J Urol. 1983 Jun;129(6):1136-40. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)52609-9.
Aspects of the clinical use of an enzymatic assay and a double antibody radioimmunoassay for prostatic acid phosphatase are compared. Standard blood sample collection and transport did not have a negative effect on the results of either assay. Our results show no substantial advantage in the use of a radioimmunoassay but emphasize the reliability of the enzymatic assay using alpha-naphthylphosphate as a substrate with respect to its predictive value and specificity in diagnosis and followup of patients with prostatic carcinoma.
对用于前列腺酸性磷酸酶的酶法测定和双抗体放射免疫测定的临床应用方面进行了比较。标准血液样本的采集和运输对两种测定结果均无负面影响。我们的结果表明，放射免疫测定并无实质性优势，但强调了以α-萘基磷酸为底物的酶法测定在前列腺癌患者诊断和随访中的预测价值和特异性方面的可靠性。
