Wong E T, McCarron M M, Shaw S T
JAMA. 1983 Jun 10;249(22):3076-80.
A review of ordering patterns for thyroid function tests and for measurements of creatine kinase (CK) isoenzyme and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) isoenzyme levels indicated considerable misuse. We employed an educational program for both types of tests, but changed the request form only for ordering the thyroid function tests. No changes were made in the forms for ordering CK and LDH isoenzyme tests. The effect was a prompt decrease in ordering triiodothyronine radioimmunoassay and thyrotropin tests to 38% and 61%, respectively, of baseline rates. There was no effect on rates of ordering CK and LDH isoenzyme tests, which were 102% and 96%, respectively, of baseline rates. The improved use of thyroid function tests was likely because of the change in the laboratory request form, since the educational strategy by itself had no effect on the ordering of CK and LDH isoenzyme tests.
对甲状腺功能测试以及肌酸激酶(CK)同工酶和乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)同工酶水平测量的医嘱模式审查表明存在大量误用情况。我们针对这两类测试开展了一项教育计划,但仅更改了甲状腺功能测试的申请表格。CK和LDH同工酶测试的申请表格未作改动。结果是,三碘甲状腺原氨酸放射免疫测定和促甲状腺激素测试的医嘱迅速降至基线水平的38%和61%。对CK和LDH同工酶测试的医嘱率没有影响,分别为基线水平的102%和96%。甲状腺功能测试使用情况的改善可能是由于实验室申请表格的更改,因为单纯的教育策略对CK和LDH同工酶测试的医嘱没有影响。