Freudenstein H, Körner L
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol. 1983 Feb;253(4):554-8.
White mice used for protection tests with pertussis vaccines when marked with fuchsin before challenge showed reduced survival rates compared with their equally treated but unmarked cage mates. The fuchsin used had been dissolved in denaturated alcohol. On account of the small amounts of marking material applied, there was probably no direct toxic effect. Further methods of marking have then been studied in this delicate test system. Contrary to expectations the marking with picric acid solution showed no adverse effect at all. The shearing of an area of the fur, however, resulted in an even more detrimental effect than the use of fuchsin. The clipping of the top of one ear rested below the level of significance. Most probably the marked mice were neither affected adversely by the handling when marked nor by an actual chemical or mechanical impairment, but by the initiation of stress induced by the majority of their unmarked cage mates. At any rate, a possible influence of the marking of animals on the result of test procedures should be carefully considered.
用于百日咳疫苗保护试验的小白鼠,在攻击前用品红标记,与同等处理但未标记的同笼伙伴相比,存活率降低。所用的品红已溶解在变性酒精中。由于所用标记材料的量很少,可能没有直接的毒性作用。然后在这个精细的试验系统中研究了其他标记方法。与预期相反,用苦味酸溶液标记根本没有显示出不利影响。然而,剪掉一块皮毛的影响比使用品红更有害。剪掉一只耳朵的顶端其影响低于显著水平。很可能被标记的小鼠既没有因标记时的处理而受到不利影响,也没有因实际的化学或机械损伤而受到不利影响,而是受到大多数未标记的同笼伙伴所引发的应激反应的影响。无论如何,应仔细考虑动物标记对试验程序结果可能产生的影响。