Clark C M, Spreen O
J Clin Neuropsychol. 1983 Jun;5(2):169-79. doi: 10.1080/01688638308401163.
The current study examined the reliability of a measure of ear advantage and the total scores derived from the dichotic listening task. The scores for both measures were found: (1) not to differ from the normal distribution, and (2) to be reliable over items, tests, and time. However, the total scores were dependent upon stimulus materials and experience. In addition, a psychometric classification model was proposed and it was found that the majority, at least 51.6% of the subjects, did not exhibit a truly measureable ear advantage. Finally, it was argued that total scores as well as ear advantage should be considered in the analysis of dichotic listening studies.
本研究考察了耳优势测量方法以及从双耳分听任务得出的总分的可靠性。发现这两种测量方法的分数:(1)与正态分布无差异,(2)在项目、测试和时间上具有可靠性。然而,总分取决于刺激材料和经验。此外,提出了一种心理测量分类模型,发现大多数受试者(至少51.6%)没有表现出真正可测量的耳优势。最后,有人认为在双耳分听研究的分析中应考虑总分以及耳优势。