• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The effect of type of delivery on neonatal outcome in singleton infants of birth weight of 1,000 g or less.

作者信息

Barrett J M, Boehm F H, Vaughn W K

出版信息

JAMA. 1983 Aug 5;250(5):625-9.

PMID:6864962
Abstract

To evaluate the relationship between management of delivery and neonatal outcome in singleton neonates with birth weights between 501 and 1,000 g, a retrospective analysis was performed. In the 54-month period ending June 30, 1981, a total of 109 singleton neonates were born at Vanderbilt University Hospital, Nashville, Tenn, with birth weights between 501 and 1,000 g, 31 weighing 501 through 750 g, and 78 weighing 751 through 1,000 g. The overall neonatal survival rate was 60%, 39% in the group weighing 501 through 750 g and 69% in the group weighing 751 through 1,000 g. In terms of morbidity and mortality, there was no difference between neonates delivered by cesarean section compared with those delivered vaginally. The only significant factor found relating to neonatal mortality was the occurrence of labor. In the 17 newborns delivered without occurrence of labor, the frequency of neonatal death was significantly decreased, although this difference may be caused by differing risk factors in the infants delivered without occurrence of labor. When labor was present and the fetus had a cephalic presentation, cesarean section was not found to be superior to vaginal delivery in terms of neonatal morbidity or mortality for neonates of 1,000 g or less.

摘要

相似文献

1
The effect of type of delivery on neonatal outcome in singleton infants of birth weight of 1,000 g or less.
JAMA. 1983 Aug 5;250(5):625-9.
2
Vaginal vs. cesarean delivery for preterm breech presentation of singleton infants in California: a population-based study.加利福尼亚州单胎早产臀位分娩的阴道分娩与剖宫产:一项基于人群的研究。
J Reprod Med. 2007 Jun;52(6):473-9.
3
The effect of cesarean delivery on birth outcome in very low birth weight infants. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network.剖宫产对极低出生体重儿出生结局的影响。美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所新生儿研究网络。
Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Apr;77(4):498-503.
4
Mode of delivery and mortality among preterm newborns.早产新生儿的分娩方式与死亡率
Ginekol Pol. 2010 Mar;81(3):203-7.
5
Method of delivery and neonatal mortality among very low birth weight infants in the United States.美国极低出生体重儿的分娩方式与新生儿死亡率
Matern Child Health J. 2006 Jan;10(1):47-53. doi: 10.1007/s10995-005-0029-z.
6
Breech delivery: evaluation of the method of delivery on perinatal results and maternal morbidity.臀位分娩:分娩方式对围产期结局及孕产妇发病率的评估
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Dec 1;135(7):965-73. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(79)90823-8.
7
The impact of vaginal delivery in premature infants weighing less than 1,251 grams.体重不足1251克的早产儿经阴道分娩的影响。
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Mar;105(3):525-31. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000154156.51578.50.
8
Cesarean section. Risk and benefits for mother and fetus.剖宫产。对母亲和胎儿的风险与益处。
JAMA. 1983 Oct 28;250(16):2157-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.250.16.2157.
9
[Appropriate delivery mode and timing of termination for pregnancy with low birth weight infants].[低出生体重儿妊娠的合适分娩方式及终止时机]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 May;50(5):323-8.
10
Mortality and morbidity in early preterm breech singletons: impact of a policy of planned vaginal delivery.极早早产单胎臀位分娩的死亡率和发病率:计划性阴道分娩政策的影响
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Sep;192:61-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.06.019. Epub 2015 Jun 26.

引用本文的文献

1
[Characteristics of delivery of the small premature infant].
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1995;257(1-4):462-71. doi: 10.1007/BF02264873.
2
Perinatal factors and adverse outcome in extremely low birthweight infants.极低出生体重儿的围产期因素与不良结局
Arch Dis Child. 1986 Jun;61(6):554-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.61.6.554.