• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

密苏里州男性农民的高频听力损失

High-frequency hearing loss in male farmers of Missouri.

作者信息

Thelin J W, Joseph D J, Davis W E, Baker D E, Hosokawa M C

出版信息

Public Health Rep. 1983 May-Jun;98(3):268-73.

PMID:6867259
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1424436/
Abstract

Farmers are exposed to noise that is potentially hazardous to hearing. We measured the hearing of 161 male farmers and 75 male nonfarmers at the 1979 Missouri Farmers Association Agri-Fair and compared it with the hearing of 129 office workers from central Missouri. Fixed-level screening tests were conducted in both ears at three stimulus frequencies: 1000 and 2000 hertz at 20 decibels hearing level and 4000 hertz at 25 decibels hearing level. Audiometers were calibrated in accordance with the ANSI-1969 standard. The results show that farmers are at risk for hearing loss at 2000 and 4000 hertz when compared with office workers. The prevalence of hearing loss was greater for farmers at both frequencies in every decade age group from 25 to 64 years. Using screening failure at 2000 and 4000 hertz in both ears as a criterion for a loss that would affect communication ability, we found that the failure rate was 16.8 percent for farmers and 6.2 percent for office workers. As other investigators have found, the prevalence of high-frequency hearing loss in male nonfarmers who associate with farmers was nearly as great as for farmers.

摘要

农民接触到的噪音可能会对听力造成危害。1979年,我们在密苏里州农民协会农业展览会上对161名男性农民和75名男性非农民的听力进行了测量,并将其与来自密苏里州中部的129名办公室职员的听力进行了比较。在三个刺激频率下对双耳进行固定水平筛查测试:听力水平为20分贝时的1000赫兹和2000赫兹,以及听力水平为25分贝时的4000赫兹。听力计按照ANSI - 1969标准进行校准。结果显示,与办公室职员相比,农民在2000赫兹和4000赫兹时存在听力损失风险。在25至64岁的每个十年年龄组中,农民在这两个频率的听力损失患病率都更高。以双耳在2000赫兹和4000赫兹时筛查未通过作为会影响沟通能力的听力损失标准,我们发现农民的未通过率为16.8%,办公室职员为6.2%。正如其他研究人员所发现的,与农民交往的男性非农民中高频听力损失的患病率几乎与农民一样高。

相似文献

1
High-frequency hearing loss in male farmers of Missouri.密苏里州男性农民的高频听力损失
Public Health Rep. 1983 May-Jun;98(3):268-73.
2
[Findings of standard and high-frequency audiometry in workers exposed to occupational noise for long durations].长期暴露于职业噪声环境的工人的标准及高频听力测定结果
Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 2003 Apr;10(4):137-42.
3
Occupational hearing loss in farmers.农民的职业性听力损失
Public Health Rep. 1992 Mar-Apr;107(2):188-92.
4
Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.一组纯音听力阈值正常的职业歌手的瞬态诱发耳声发射。
Ear Hear. 2008 Jun;29(3):360-77. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31816a0d1e.
5
Perceived and measured hearing ability in construction laborers and farmers.建筑工人和农民的听力感知与测量能力
Am J Ind Med. 2003 Oct;44(4):431-7. doi: 10.1002/ajim.10286.
6
[Comparative analysis of occupational hearing loss risk among private farmers with reference to decision-making criteria contained in the cabinet ordinances (current and previous)].参照内阁法令(现行和先前)所载决策标准对个体农户职业性听力损失风险进行的比较分析
Med Pr. 2005;56(6):451-60.
7
Hearing sensitivity in farmers.农民的听力敏感度
Public Health Rep. 1988 Jan-Feb;103(1):61-71.
8
Preliminary evaluation of occupational hearing loss risk among private farmers.个体农户职业性听力损失风险的初步评估
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2003;10(2):211-5.
9
[Hearing disorders among private farmers in Poland].[波兰个体农民的听力障碍]
Med Pr. 2002;53(4):299-305.
10
[Sensorineural hearing loss in children starting school. Results of a representative hearing screening study].[刚入学儿童的感音神经性听力损失。一项代表性听力筛查研究的结果]
HNO. 1995 Jan;43(1):31-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Noise-induced hearing loss in farmworkers: a scoping review.农场工人的噪声性听力损失:一项范围综述
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 3;13:1502489. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1502489. eCollection 2025.
2
Hearing Difficulties Among Farmworkers in the México-US Southwest Border Region.美墨边境西南部农业工人的听力困难。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2024 Aug;26(4):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s10903-024-01592-8. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
3
Assessing Hearing Conservation Program Effectiveness: Results of a Multisite Assessment.评估听力保护计划的有效性:多地点评估的结果。
J Occup Environ Med. 2018 Jan;60(1):29-35. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001125.
4
A Hearing Loss Prevention Outreach Program for Farmers and Motorsports Enthusiasts.一项针对农民和赛车运动爱好者的听力损失预防宣传计划。
Semin Hear. 2017 May;38(2):212-222. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1601576.
5
Gender differences in use of hearing protection devices among farm operators.农场经营者在使用听力保护设备方面的性别差异。
Noise Health. 2016 Nov-Dec;18(85):368-375. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.195803.
6
Effects of interventions on use of hearing protectors among farm operators: A randomized controlled trial.干预措施对农场经营者使用听力保护器的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Audiol. 2016;55 Suppl 1(0):S3-12. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1122239. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
7
Protocol of a randomized controlled trial of hearing protection interventions for farm operators.农场经营者听力保护干预措施的随机对照试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 18;15:399. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1743-0.
8
Occupational hazards of farming.农业的职业危害。
Can Fam Physician. 1989 Nov;35:2331-6.
9
Hearing sensitivity in farmers.农民的听力敏感度
Public Health Rep. 1988 Jan-Feb;103(1):61-71.
10
Hearing loss among high school farm students.高中农场学生的听力损失
Am J Public Health. 1989 May;79(5):619-22. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.5.619.

本文引用的文献

1
Age and sex differences in pure-tone thresholds. Survey of hearing levels from 18 to 65 years.纯音听阈的年龄和性别差异。18至65岁听力水平调查。
Arch Otolaryngol. 1963 Apr;77:385-405. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1963.00750010399008.
2
Hearing loss as a function of age.听力损失与年龄的关系。
Laryngoscope. 1962 Nov;72:1596-610. doi: 10.1288/00005537-196211000-00006.
3
The effect of tractor noise on the auditory sensitivity of tractor operators.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1958 Jun;67(2):372-88. doi: 10.1177/000348945806700209.
4
The presbycusis component in occupational hearing loss.职业性听力损失中的老年性聋因素
Laryngoscope. 1972 Aug;82(8):1399-409. doi: 10.1288/00005537-197208000-00002.