• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脾切除术或脾组织异位移植作为脾切除的替代方法。对肺炎球菌败血症的再生及保护作用。

Splenic resection or heterotopic transplantation of splenic tissue as alternatives to splenectomy. Regeneration and protective effect against pneumococcal septicemia.

作者信息

Alwmark A, Bengmark S, Gullstrand P, Idvall I, Schalén C

出版信息

Eur Surg Res. 1983;15(4):217-22. doi: 10.1159/000128356.

DOI:10.1159/000128356
PMID:6873120
Abstract

In 82 male Sprague-Dawley rats, divided into eight groups according to surgical procedure performed (total splenectomy, sham operation and six different modes of splenic conservation), resistance to intravenous injection of 4 X 10(3) CFU of Streptococcus pneumoniae type I was evaluated 16 weeks after the surgical procedures. Significant regeneration of the spleen and almost normal resistance to pneumococci was seen 16 weeks after a two-thirds resection. Pieces of the spleen, implanted subcutaneously or into the greater omentum, also showed marked regeneration; though survival time was prolonged, the mortality among these animals following injection with pneumococci did not, however, differ from that of totally splenectomized animals. Dispersed splenic tissue, injected subcutaneously, intramuscularly, or retroperitoneally, showed less sign of regeneration and had no effect on mortality or survival time in partially vis-à-vis totally splenectomized rats.

摘要

在82只雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠中,根据所施行的手术程序(全脾切除术、假手术以及六种不同的脾脏保留模式)分为八组,在手术操作16周后评估对静脉注射4×10³CFUⅠ型肺炎链球菌的抵抗力。三分之二脾切除术后16周可见脾脏显著再生且对肺炎球菌的抵抗力几乎正常。皮下或大网膜植入脾脏碎片也显示出明显再生;尽管生存时间延长,但这些动物注射肺炎球菌后的死亡率与全脾切除动物并无差异。皮下、肌肉内或腹膜后注射分散的脾组织再生迹象较少,对部分脾切除与全脾切除大鼠的死亡率或生存时间均无影响。

相似文献

1
Splenic resection or heterotopic transplantation of splenic tissue as alternatives to splenectomy. Regeneration and protective effect against pneumococcal septicemia.脾切除术或脾组织异位移植作为脾切除的替代方法。对肺炎球菌败血症的再生及保护作用。
Eur Surg Res. 1983;15(4):217-22. doi: 10.1159/000128356.
2
Comparison of omental splenic autotransplant to partial splenectomy. Protective effect against septic death.大网膜脾自体移植与部分脾切除术的比较。对感染性死亡的保护作用。
Am Surg. 1987 Dec;53(12):702-5.
3
Relative merits of partial splenectomy, splenic reimplantation, and immunization in preventing postsplenectomy infection.脾部分切除术、脾再植术及免疫在预防脾切除术后感染中的相对优势。
Surgery. 1979 Oct;86(4):561-9.
4
Autotransplantation of splenic tissue after splenectomy in rats offers partial protection against intravenous pneumococcal challenge.大鼠脾切除术后自体脾组织移植可对静脉注射肺炎球菌攻击提供部分保护。
Eur Surg Res. 1987;19(3):135-9. doi: 10.1159/000128692.
5
Protection against pneumococcal sepsis in splenectomized rats by implantation of splenic tissue into an omental pouch.通过将脾组织植入网膜囊对脾切除大鼠进行肺炎球菌败血症的防护。
Surgery. 1982 Jun;91(6):638-41.
6
Optimal site and amount of splenic tissue for autotransplantation.自体移植的脾脏组织的最佳部位和数量。
J Surg Res. 1992 Aug;53(2):109-16. doi: 10.1016/0022-4804(92)90021-q.
7
Splenic tissue autotransplantation in rabbits: no restoration of host defense.兔脾组织自体移植:宿主防御功能未恢复。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2003 Jan;387(9-10):379-85. doi: 10.1007/s00423-002-0334-6. Epub 2002 Dec 18.
8
[Immunologic function against infection in splenic autotransplanted mice].[脾自体移植小鼠抗感染的免疫功能]
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1991 May;92(5):567-76.
9
Splenic autotransplantation provides protection against fatal sepsis in young but not in old rats.脾自体移植可保护幼鼠免受致命性败血症的侵害,但对老年大鼠则无此作用。
J Pediatr Surg. 1992 Sep;27(9):1207-12. doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(92)90789-a.
10
Intraperitoneal splenic implants do not alter clearance of pneumococcal bacteremia.腹腔内脾脏植入物不会改变肺炎球菌菌血症的清除率。
Am Surg. 1985 May;51(5):269-71.

引用本文的文献

1
Regeneration and function of autotransplantation of splenic tissue after splenectomy.脾切除术后脾组织自体移植的再生与功能
World J Surg. 1986 Oct;10(5):860-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01655260.