• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Experimentation with human subjects: a critique of the views of Hans Jonas.人体实验:对汉斯·乔纳斯观点的批判
J Med Ethics. 1983 Jun;9(2):76-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.9.2.76.
2
Beyond voluntary consent: Hans Jonas on the moral requirements of human experimentation.超越自愿同意:汉斯·约纳斯论人体实验的道德要求。
J Med Ethics. 1993 Jun;19(2):99-103. doi: 10.1136/jme.19.2.99.
3
Experimenting on human subjects: philosophical perspectives.以人类为实验对象:哲学视角
Case West Reserve Law Rev. 1975 Spring;25(3):434-71.
4
Is there a duty to serve as a subject in biomedical research?在生物医学研究中担任受试者是否存在义务?
IRB. 1984 Sep-Oct;6(5):1-5.
5
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
6
Balancing moral principles in federal regulations on human research.在联邦人类研究法规中平衡道德原则。
IRB. 1992 Jan-Feb;14(1):1-6.
7
Experimenting with embryos: can philosophy help?胚胎实验:哲学能有所帮助吗?
Bioethics. 1996 Oct;10(4):292-309. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1996.tb00130.x.
8
Hans Jonas and the Ethics of Human Subjects Research.汉斯·约纳斯与人体受试者研究伦理学。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2020 Jan;50(1):8-9. doi: 10.1002/hast.1077.
9
Nursing research: is there an obligation on subjects to participate?护理研究:受试者有参与的义务吗?
J Adv Nurs. 1991 Nov;16(11):1284-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1991.tb01555.x.
10
Research with human subjects.涉及人类受试者的研究。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1988 Oct-Nov;18(5):47-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-tracking the microbiome: where do we go from here?自我追踪微生物组:我们从哪里开始?
Microbiome. 2015 Dec 12;3:70. doi: 10.1186/s40168-015-0138-x.
2
Experimental ethics in sports medicine research.运动医学研究中的实验伦理
Sports Med. 1990 Mar;9(3):143-50. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199009030-00002.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethics and clinical research.伦理与临床研究
N Engl J Med. 1966 Jun 16;274(24):1354-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196606162742405.
2
Treating problem children with stimulant drugs.用兴奋剂药物治疗问题儿童。
N Engl J Med. 1973 Aug 23;289(8):407-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197308232890806.

人体实验:对汉斯·乔纳斯观点的批判

Experimentation with human subjects: a critique of the views of Hans Jonas.

作者信息

Schafer A

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 1983 Jun;9(2):76-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.9.2.76.

DOI:10.1136/jme.9.2.76
PMID:6876101
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1059345/
Abstract

The ethics of experimentation on human subjects has become the subject of much debate among medical scientists and philosophers. Ethical problems and conflicts of interest become especially serious when research subjects are recruited from the class of patients. Are patients who are ill and suffering in a position to give voluntary and informed consent? Are there inevitable conflicts of interest and moral obligation when a personal physician recruits his own patients for an experiment designed partly to advance scientific knowledge and only partly as therapy for those patients? The views of the eminent American ethicist Hans Jonas on these issues are briefly summarised and criticised, and some moral guidelines are then proposed to regulate experimentation on human subjects.

摘要

人体实验的伦理道德已成为医学科学家和哲学家们广泛争论的话题。当从患者群体中招募研究对象时,伦理问题和利益冲突就变得尤为严重。患病受苦的患者能够做出自愿且知情的同意吗?当私人医生招募自己的患者参与一项部分旨在推进科学知识、部分仅作为对这些患者的治疗的实验时,是否存在不可避免的利益冲突和道德义务呢?美国著名伦理学家汉斯·乔纳斯对这些问题的观点将被简要总结并批判,随后提出一些道德准则来规范人体实验。