Rohman M, Ivatury R R, Steichen F M, Gaudino J, Nallathambi M N, Khan M, Stahl W M
J Trauma. 1983 Jul;23(7):570-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198307000-00005.
The results of emergency room thoracotomy (ERT) and cardiorrhaphy for 91 patients with penetrating cardiac injuries admitted in extremis to Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Center from 1963 to 1981 are reviewed to determine criteria for selection of patients for this procedure. Four groups were defined based on the severity of the effects of their injuries. The survival rates were 32.1 and 33.3%, respectively, for Group I ('fatal') and Group II ('agonal') patients. There were no survivors in Group IV ('D.O.A.') patients for whom ERT is a fruitless procedure. Survival in Group III ('profound shock') patients was only 40%, which might have been improved if ERT had been performed without delay. We conclude that ERT is essential for patients with 'fatal' and 'agonal' wounds and advise prompt ERT for patients in 'profound shock' who do not respond immediately to rapid volume infusion.
回顾了1963年至1981年期间在林肯医疗和心理健康中心因极度危急情况收治的91例穿透性心脏损伤患者进行急诊室开胸手术(ERT)和心脏修补术的结果,以确定该手术患者的选择标准。根据损伤影响的严重程度将患者分为四组。I组(“致命”)和II组(“濒死”)患者的生存率分别为32.1%和33.3%。IV组(“到达时已死亡”)患者没有幸存者,对他们进行ERT是徒劳的。III组(“深度休克”)患者的生存率仅为40%,如果能及时进行ERT,生存率可能会提高。我们得出结论,ERT对“致命”和“濒死”伤口的患者至关重要,并建议对“深度休克”且对快速补液无立即反应的患者迅速进行ERT。