Suppr超能文献

血吸虫性输尿管的回肠替代:是否值得?

Ileal replacement of the bilharzial ureter: is it worthwhile?

作者信息

Bazeed M A, El-Rakhawy M, Ashamallah A, El-Kappany H, El-Hammady S

出版信息

J Urol. 1983 Aug;130(2):245-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)51084-8.

Abstract

Our 14-year experience with the use of isolated ileal segments for replacement of the bilharzial ureter is analyzed retrospectively. Of 52 patients subjected to this procedure followup data were available for 38, in whom 52 ureters were repaired. The results generally were unsatisfactory: the morbidity and mortality rates were high and the percentage of functional improvement was low. The risk was higher for patients with low creatinine clearance. Therefore, we recommend that this operation be avoided when possible. If the operation is unavoidable, tapering of the ileal segment with antireflux ileovesical anastomosis may improve the outcome. Further clinical study must be done.

摘要

我们回顾性分析了使用游离回肠段替代血吸虫病性输尿管的14年经验。52例接受该手术的患者中,38例有随访数据,共修复了52条输尿管。结果总体不尽人意:发病率和死亡率高,功能改善率低。肌酐清除率低的患者风险更高。因此,我们建议尽可能避免该手术。如果手术不可避免,采用抗反流回肠膀胱吻合术使回肠段变细可能会改善结果。必须进行进一步的临床研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验