• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性心肌梗死的漏诊。一家大型社区医院的临床病理经验。

Failure to diagnose acute myocardial infarction. The clinicopathologic experience at a large community hospital.

作者信息

Zarling E J, Sexton H, Milnor P

出版信息

JAMA. 1983 Sep 2;250(9):1177-81.

PMID:6876356
Abstract

A retrospective study of 100 consecutive cases of autopsy-proved acute myocardial infarction has disclosed a surprisingly low frequency (53%) of correct antemortem diagnoses. Incorrect diagnoses seemed to be caused by (1) unjustified dependence on misleading laboratory studies, (2) inattention to suggestive or diagnostic laboratory studies, (3) atypical or obscure presentation of myocardial infarction, and (4) failure to consider acute myocardial infarction as a diagnostic possibility, particularly when the responsible physician was not a specialist in internal medicine or its subspecialty of cardiology. Suggested corrective measures are a more appropriate use of the ECG and the laboratory and education and reeducation of selected groups of physicians.

摘要

一项对100例经尸检证实的急性心肌梗死连续病例的回顾性研究发现,生前正确诊断的频率出奇地低(53%)。诊断错误似乎是由以下原因造成的:(1)对具有误导性的实验室检查结果过度依赖;(2)对提示性或诊断性实验室检查结果不够重视;(3)心肌梗死的表现不典型或不明显;(4)没有将急性心肌梗死作为一种诊断可能性来考虑,尤其是当主治医生不是内科或其心脏病学亚专业的专家时。建议的纠正措施是更恰当地使用心电图和实验室检查,并对特定医生群体进行教育和再教育。

相似文献

1
Failure to diagnose acute myocardial infarction. The clinicopathologic experience at a large community hospital.急性心肌梗死的漏诊。一家大型社区医院的临床病理经验。
JAMA. 1983 Sep 2;250(9):1177-81.
2
[Unrecognised acute myocardial infarct in a nine-year autopsy material].
Orv Hetil. 1994 Jun 26;135(26):1411-4.
3
Ability of triage decision rules for rapid electrocardiogram to identify patients with suspected ST-elevation myocardial infarction.快速心电图分诊决策规则识别疑似ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的能力。
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2012 Dec;11(4):211-3. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e31826f4e8e.
4
[Computer-based interpretation of ECG--guiding or misleading?].[基于计算机的心电图解读——是指导还是误导?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1999 Sep 30;119(23):3441-4.
5
Electrocardiogram differentiation of benign early repolarization versus acute myocardial infarction by emergency physicians and cardiologists.急诊科医生和心脏病专家对良性早期复极与急性心肌梗死的心电图鉴别
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Sep;13(9):961-6. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.04.014. Epub 2006 Aug 2.
6
Implications of the failure to identify high-risk electrocardiogram findings for the quality of care of patients with acute myocardial infarction: results of the Emergency Department Quality in Myocardial Infarction (EDQMI) study.未能识别高危心电图表现对急性心肌梗死患者医疗质量的影响:心肌梗死急诊科质量(EDQMI)研究结果
Circulation. 2006 Oct 10;114(15):1565-71. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.623652. Epub 2006 Oct 2.
7
Death certificates are not reliable: revivification of the autopsy.死亡证明不可靠:尸检的复苏。
South Med J. 2006 Jul;99(7):728-33. doi: 10.1097/01.smj.0000224337.77074.57.
8
Failure to diagnose acute myocardial infarction.
Aust Fam Physician. 2002 Sep;31(9):837-8.
9
[A comparative investigation of the clinical value of an ECG-computer analysis (author's transl)].
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1974 Oct 4;86(18):523-7.
10
[The unrecognized myocardial infarction].
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2010 Dec;135(49):2451-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1269415. Epub 2010 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergency department routine data and the diagnosis of acute ischemic heart disease in patients with atypical chest pain.急诊科常规数据与不典型胸痛患者急性缺血性心脏病的诊断。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 5;15(11):e0241920. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241920. eCollection 2020.
2
A 0/1-Hour Algorithm Using High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin.一种使用高敏心肌肌钙蛋白的0/1小时算法。
J Acute Med. 2018 Jun 1;8(2):47-52. doi: 10.6705/j.jacme.201806_8(2).0002.
3
[Adult autopsies during the past decade in Germany : Data from two university hospitals].
[德国过去十年的成人尸检:来自两家大学医院的数据]
Pathologe. 2017 Sep;38(5):430-437. doi: 10.1007/s00292-017-0319-4.
4
[Autopsies 2010. Is death still teaching the living?].[2010年尸检。死亡仍在教导生者吗?]
Pathologe. 2010 Jul;31(4):297-302. doi: 10.1007/s00292-010-1285-2.
5
Evaluation of the value of rapid D-dimer test in conjunction with cardiac troponin I test for early risk stratification of myocardial infarction.评估快速 D-二聚体试验联合心肌肌钙蛋白 I 试验对心肌梗死早期危险分层的价值。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2010 Nov;30(4):472-8. doi: 10.1007/s11239-010-0469-1.
6
Safety and efficiency of emergency department assessment of chest discomfort.急诊科对胸痛评估的安全性与效率
CMAJ. 2004 Jun 8;170(12):1803-7. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1031315.
7
Multicentre evaluation of the diagnostic value of cardiac troponin T, CK-MB mass, and myoglobin for assessing patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes in routine clinical practice.心肌肌钙蛋白T、肌酸激酶同工酶质量和肌红蛋白在常规临床实践中对疑似急性冠脉综合征患者评估的诊断价值的多中心评估
Heart. 2003 Mar;89(3):280-6. doi: 10.1136/heart.89.3.280.
8
Acute rest myocardial perfusion imaging in the emergency department: a technique whose time has come... or gone?急诊科急性静息心肌灌注成像:一项时机已到……还是已逝的技术?
J Nucl Cardiol. 2002 May-Jun;9(3):350-2. doi: 10.1067/mnc.2002.124477.
9
Prospective audit of incidence of prognostically important myocardial damage in patients discharged from emergency department.对急诊科出院患者中具有预后重要性的心肌损伤发生率进行前瞻性审计。
BMJ. 2000 Jun 24;320(7251):1702-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7251.1702.
10
Comparison of the diagnostic performance of two rapid bedside biochemical assays in the early detection of acute myocardial infarction.两种快速床边生化检测方法在急性心肌梗死早期检测中的诊断性能比较。
Clin Cardiol. 1998 Jun;21(6):394-8. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960210605.