Logigian M K, Samuels M A, Falconer J, Zagar R
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1983 Aug;64(8):364-7.
This investigation evaluated the effectiveness of the traditional and facilitation approaches to therapeutic exercise in stroke patients. A total of 42 adults (24 men and 18 women) with a mean age of 61.6 years (SD = 21) were selected from a larger population of hospitalized stroke victims. Stroke patients were classified by CT scan information and judged medically fit to participate in a nonrestrictive program by neurologic examinations and laboratory tests. The Barthel Index and the manual muscle test were administered at admission and discharge. Both facilitation and traditional exercise therapies improved functional and motor performance, but there were no significant differences between these approaches. The lack of differences between the facilitation and traditional exercise therapies may be due to heterogeneity of the stroke population, the small sample size, and the measurements used. The study demonstrates the need for a measurement instrument capable of reliably assessing the facilitation approach. Future investigations should incorporate lesion type, site, and side along with global measurements in evaluating differences among motor remediation approaches.
本研究评估了传统治疗性锻炼方法与促进性锻炼方法对中风患者的有效性。从大量住院中风患者中选取了42名成年人(24名男性和18名女性),平均年龄为61.6岁(标准差 = 21)。根据CT扫描信息对中风患者进行分类,并通过神经学检查和实验室测试判定其在医学上适合参与非限制性项目。在入院时和出院时进行巴氏指数和徒手肌力测试。促进性锻炼疗法和传统锻炼疗法均改善了功能和运动表现,但这两种方法之间没有显著差异。促进性锻炼疗法和传统锻炼疗法之间缺乏差异可能是由于中风患者群体的异质性、样本量小以及所使用的测量方法。该研究表明需要一种能够可靠评估促进性锻炼方法的测量工具。未来的研究在评估运动康复方法之间的差异时,应纳入病变类型、部位和侧别以及整体测量。