Thompson J K, Raczynski J M, Haber J D, Sturgis E T
Biofeedback Self Regul. 1983 Mar;8(1):153-64. doi: 10.1007/BF01000545.
Well-delineated models and procedural descriptions are noticeably missing from the clinical biofeedback literature dealing with the training of physiological self-control. As a consequence, optimal protocols for the assessment and training of self-control of physiological functions have not eventuated. The present article reviews evidence suggesting that researchers have (a) confused self-control training, assessment, and measurement of tonic response levels, (b) neglected to determine the degree of acquired physiological self-control, and (c) failed to report the relationship between level of acquired physiological control and clinical outcome. The article also proposes an assessment and training paradigm that may be useful in reducing these methodological problems in future biofeedback research.
在涉及生理自我控制训练的临床生物反馈文献中,明显缺少明确的模型和程序描述。因此,尚未形成用于评估和训练生理功能自我控制的最佳方案。本文回顾了相关证据,表明研究人员存在以下问题:(a)混淆了自我控制训练、评估以及紧张性反应水平的测量;(b)忽视了确定获得性生理自我控制的程度;(c)未报告获得性生理控制水平与临床结果之间的关系。本文还提出了一种评估和训练范式,这可能有助于在未来的生物反馈研究中减少这些方法学问题。