Després J P, Bouchard C, Bukowiecki L, Savard R, Lupien J
Int J Obes. 1983;7(3):231-40.
Twenty-three male subjects, 31.7 (mean) +/- 7.4 (s.d.) yr of age, weight 70.7 +/- 9.0 kg and with 13.4 +/- 4.7 percent body fat were submitted twice within a week to biopsies of subcutaneous adipose tissue in the suprailiac region. Two biopsies (sample A and B) were obtained on day 1 and two others (sample C and D) in the contralateral region on day 2. Average fat cell diameter (ACD) was assessed by measuring at least 500 cells per subject. There was no significant difference between day 1 and day 2 for ACD (means 1 = 62.6 +/- 12.2 micron; means 2 = 63.2 +/- 12.3 micron). Intra-class reliability coefficient reached 0.97. ANOVA-RBFD showed no day or sample effects (P greater than 0.05) on ACD. Basal (BL), epinephrine submaximal (10(-5) M) (ESML) and epinephrine maximal (10(-4) M) (EML) stimulated lipolysis have been determined for 18 of these subjects. Intra-class reliabilities were moderately high, reaching 0.71 for BL, 0.83 for ESML and 0.72 for EML, respectively. Controlling the level of activity for 36 h prior to the biopsies resulted, however, in increased coefficients. In this case, intra-class coefficients computed with 11 subjects were 0.99 for BL, 0.88 for ESML and 0.85 for EML. The data demonstrate that ACD and lipolytic capacity can be reliably measured, particularly when activity of subjects is controlled during the 36-h period preceding the biopsies.
23名男性受试者,平均年龄31.7±7.4岁,体重70.7±9.0千克,体脂率13.4±4.7%,在一周内接受了两次髂上区域皮下脂肪组织活检。第1天获取两份活检样本(样本A和B),第2天在对侧区域获取另外两份活检样本(样本C和D)。通过测量每位受试者至少500个细胞来评估平均脂肪细胞直径(ACD)。第1天和第2天的ACD无显著差异(均值1 = 62.6±12.2微米;均值2 = 63.2±12.3微米)。组内可靠性系数达到0.97。方差分析-RBFD显示,ACD不存在日间或样本效应(P>0.05)。对其中18名受试者测定了基础(BL)、次最大肾上腺素(10⁻⁵ M)(ESML)和最大肾上腺素(10⁻⁴ M)(EML)刺激的脂解作用。组内可靠性中等偏高,BL为0.71,ESML为0.83,EML为0.72。然而,在活检前控制36小时的活动水平会导致系数增加。在这种情况下,用11名受试者计算的组内系数,BL为0.99,ESML为0.88,EML为0.85。数据表明,ACD和脂解能力可以可靠地测量,特别是在活检前36小时内控制受试者活动的情况下。