Lee C S, Peterson J C, Marbury T C
J Clin Pharmacol. 1983 Jul;23(7):274-80. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1983.tb02735.x.
Dialysis clearance and drug recovery of theophylline were investigated in three peritoneal dialysis patients and the results were compared with those obtained from five hemodialysis patients. Peritoneal clearance averaged 9.5 ml/min, in contrast with the hemodialysis clearance of 84.8 ml/min, indicating a relative inefficiency of peritoneal dialysis with regard to theophylline removal. Theophylline half-life was reduced substantially during hemodialysis, 2.0 to 3.2 hours, in comparison with the normal half-life range of 4.7 to 6.8 hours during peritoneal dialysis. The fraction of theophylline recovered by peritoneal dialysis approximated 3.2 per cent of dose, while hemodialysis recovered up to 40 per cent of the administered dose. The overall observations of half-life, dialysis clearance, and drug recovery suggest a clear advantage of hemodialysis over peritoneal dialysis for theophylline detoxification. However, peritoneal dialysis may be preferred to hemodialysis for uremic patients requiring theophylline therapy. Since the removal of theophylline by peritoneal dialysis is minimal, an undesirable alteration of the theophylline dosage regimen in association with dialysis therapy can thus be avoided.
在三名腹膜透析患者中研究了茶碱的透析清除率和药物回收率,并将结果与五名血液透析患者的结果进行了比较。腹膜清除率平均为9.5毫升/分钟,而血液透析清除率为84.8毫升/分钟,这表明腹膜透析在清除茶碱方面相对效率较低。血液透析期间茶碱半衰期大幅缩短,为2.0至3.2小时,而腹膜透析期间正常半衰期范围为4.7至6.8小时。腹膜透析回收的茶碱分数约为剂量的3.2%,而血液透析回收的剂量高达给药剂量的40%。关于半衰期、透析清除率和药物回收率的总体观察结果表明,在茶碱解毒方面,血液透析明显优于腹膜透析。然而,对于需要茶碱治疗的尿毒症患者,腹膜透析可能比血液透析更可取。由于腹膜透析对茶碱的清除极少,因此可以避免与透析治疗相关的茶碱剂量方案的不良改变。