Sims J, Dana R H, Bolton B
J Pers Assess. 1983 Jun;47(3):250-7. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4703_5.
This review examines the current status of research on indicators of anxiety in the Draw-A-Person Test (DAP). Experimental studies have used stress induction while correlational studies have typically employed the Manifest Anxiety Scale as criterion. Three scoring systems (Engle-Suppes, Handler, Royal) have included most of the available anxiety indices. Methodological problems with this research include failure to control for drawing quality and intelligence, confounding anxiety measurement with defensive response style, and inadequate validation of the scoring systems. Results of the review are summarized in eight specific conclusions.
本综述探讨了画人测验（DAP）中焦虑指标的研究现状。实验研究采用了压力诱导法，而相关研究通常以显性焦虑量表作为标准。三种评分系统（恩格尔 - 苏佩斯、汉德勒、皇家）涵盖了大部分现有的焦虑指标。该研究的方法学问题包括未控制绘画质量和智力因素、焦虑测量与防御反应方式的混淆，以及评分系统验证不足。综述结果总结为八点具体结论。
