• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

交往焦虑量表:结构效度与效标关联效度

The Interaction Anxiousness Scale: construct and criterion-related validity.

作者信息

Leary M R, Kowalski R M

机构信息

Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 1993 Aug;61(1):136-46. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6101_10.

DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa6101_10
PMID:8377098
Abstract

This article presents data regarding the validity and reliability of the Interaction Anxiousness Scale (IAS; Leary 1983c), a self-report measure of dispositional social anxiety. The IAS demonstrates high test-retest and internal reliability. Correlations with measures relevant to social and general anxiety document its convergent and discriminant validity, and it correlates well with measures of anxiety and interpersonal concern in actual interactions.

摘要

本文介绍了关于交往焦虑量表(IAS;Leary,1983c)有效性和可靠性的数据,该量表是一种用于测量特质性社交焦虑的自陈量表。IAS显示出较高的重测信度和内部信度。与社交焦虑和一般焦虑相关测量指标的相关性证明了其聚合效度和区分效度,并且它与实际交往中焦虑和人际关注的测量指标相关性良好。

相似文献

1
The Interaction Anxiousness Scale: construct and criterion-related validity.交往焦虑量表:结构效度与效标关联效度
J Pers Assess. 1993 Aug;61(1):136-46. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6101_10.
2
Social anxiousness: the construct and its measurement.社交焦虑:概念及其测量
J Pers Assess. 1983 Feb;47(1):66-75. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4701_8.
3
The Social Reticence Scale: an objective instrument to measure shyness.社交沉默量表:一种测量羞怯的客观工具。
J Pers Assess. 1982 Dec;46(6):629-31. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4606_12.
4
Exploring the psychometric properties and construct validity of the MCMI-III anxiety and avoidant personality scales.探索米隆临床多轴问卷第三版(MCMI-III)焦虑和回避型人格量表的心理测量特性及结构效度。
J Pers Assess. 2003 Dec;81(3):237-41. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA8103_06.
5
[The Beck Anxiety Inventory. Psychometric properties of a French translation].[贝克焦虑量表。法语翻译的心理测量特性]
Encephale. 1994 Jan-Feb;20(1):47-55.
6
Reliability and validity of the Coolidge Axis II Inventory: a new inventory for the assessment of personality disorders.《柯立芝轴II量表的信效度:一种用于评估人格障碍的新量表》
J Pers Assess. 1992 Oct;59(2):223-38. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5902_1.
7
Validation of the Social Appearance Anxiety Scale: factor, convergent, and divergent validity.社会外貌焦虑量表的验证:因子、聚合和发散效度。
Assessment. 2011 Sep;18(3):350-6. doi: 10.1177/1073191111404808. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
8
Measurement of ambivalent and purposeful engagement after aversive social experiences.
J Anxiety Disord. 2008 May;22(4):693-706. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.07.003. Epub 2007 Jul 10.
9
Self-discrepancy: comparisons of the psychometric properties of three instruments.自我差异:三种工具的心理计量学特性比较。
Psychol Assess. 2010 Dec;22(4):878-92. doi: 10.1037/a0020644.
10
Validity of the PAI interpersonal scales for measuring the dimensions of the interpersonal circumplex.PAI 人际关系量表测量人际关系双相模型各维度的有效性。
J Pers Assess. 2011 Jan;93(1):33-9. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2011.529013.

引用本文的文献

1
Stage 2 Registered Report Personal factors and group creative outcomes: A correlational meta-analysis.第二阶段注册报告 个人因素与团队创造性成果:一项相关性元分析
F1000Res. 2024 Aug 7;13:904. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.145939.1. eCollection 2024.
2
Connected by Boredom: A Systematic Review of the Role of Trait Boredom in Problematic Technology Use.因无聊而关联:对特质无聊在问题性技术使用中作用的系统评价
Brain Sci. 2025 Jul 25;15(8):794. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15080794.
3
Investigating phubbing behaviors among university students: a latent profile analysis study.
调查大学生中的低头族行为:一项潜在剖面分析研究。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Aug 8;13(1):886. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03212-y.
4
Social Anxiety and Smartphone Addiction in Chinese University Students: A Moderated Mediation Model of Rumination and Gender.中国大学生的社交焦虑与智能手机成瘾:反刍思维和性别的有调节中介模型
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 9;13(8):862. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13080862.
5
Testing, revision and application of the social anxiety scale for Chinese social media users.中国社交媒体用户社交焦虑量表的测试、修订与应用
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 9;15:1378093. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1378093. eCollection 2024.
6
Psychometric evaluation of the Social Touch Questionnaire in Chinese adolescents.青少年社会触觉问卷的心理计量学评估。
Psych J. 2024 Dec;13(6):943-953. doi: 10.1002/pchj.789. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
7
Factors Associated With Perception of Stigma Among Parents of Children With Cleft Lip and Palate: Cross-Sectional Study.唇腭裂患儿家长耻辱感认知的相关因素:横断面研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Mar 4;8:e53353. doi: 10.2196/53353.
8
Cross-lagged analysis of rumination and social anxiety among Chinese college students.中国大学生反刍思维和社交焦虑的交叉滞后分析。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Jan 16;12(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01515-6.
9
Problem Solving and Emotion Coping Styles for Social Anxiety: A Meta-analysis of Chinese Mainland Students.社交焦虑的问题解决与情绪应对方式:中国大陆学生的元分析
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2025 Apr;56(2):328-345. doi: 10.1007/s10578-023-01561-6. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
10
How relative deprivation affects the sleep quality of Chinese college students: testing an integrated model of social anxiety and trait mindfulness.相对剥夺如何影响中国大学生的睡眠质量:检验社会焦虑与特质正念的整合模型
Front Psychol. 2023 May 18;14:1111845. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1111845. eCollection 2023.