Sharma R K
Public Health Rep. 1980 Nov-Dec;95(6):572-9.
THREE MODELS FOR FORECASTING HOME HEALTH CARE (HHC) NEEDS ARE ANALYZED: HSA/SP model (Health Systems Agency of Southwestern Pennsylvania); Florida model (Florida State Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services); and Rhode Island model (Rhode Island Department of Community Affairs). A utilization approach to forecasting is also presented.In the HSA/SP and Florida models, need for HHC is based on a certain proportion of (a) hospital admissions and (b) patients entering HHC from other sources. The major advantage of these models is that they are relatively easy to use and explain; their major weaknesses are an imprecise definition of need and an incomplete model specification.The Rhode Island approach defines need for HHC in terms of the health status of the population as measured by chronic activity limitations. The major strengths of this approach are its explicit assumptions and its emphasis on consumer needs. The major drawback is that it requires considerable local area data.The utilization approach is based on extrapolation from observed utilization experience of the target population. Its main limitation is that it is based on current market imperfections; its major advantage is that it exposes existing deficiencies in HHC.The author concludes that each approach should be tested empirically in order to refine it, and that need and demand approaches be used jointly in the planning process.
本文分析了三种预测家庭医疗保健(HHC)需求的模型:宾夕法尼亚西南部卫生系统机构(HSA/SP)模型、佛罗里达州卫生与康复服务部模型(佛罗里达模型)以及罗德岛社区事务部模型(罗德岛模型)。同时还介绍了一种预测利用率的方法。
在HSA/SP模型和佛罗里达模型中,家庭医疗保健需求是基于一定比例的(a)住院人数以及(b)从其他来源进入家庭医疗保健系统的患者人数。这些模型的主要优点是相对易于使用和解释;其主要缺点是需求定义不精确且模型规格不完整。
罗德岛模型根据慢性活动受限衡量的人群健康状况来定义家庭医疗保健需求。该方法的主要优点是其明确的假设以及对消费者需求的强调。主要缺点是需要大量的当地数据。
利用率方法是基于对目标人群观察到的利用经验进行推断。其主要局限性在于它基于当前的市场缺陷;主要优点是它揭示了家庭医疗保健中现有的不足。
作者得出结论,每种方法都应通过实证检验进行完善,并且在规划过程中应联合使用需求和需求方法。