Suppr超能文献

医师服务行业内部的竞争:整骨疗法医师和对抗疗法医师。

Competition within the physicians' services industry: osteopaths and allopaths.

作者信息

Blackstone E A

出版信息

Am J Law Med. 1982 Summer;8(2):137-50.

PMID:6897334
Abstract

Within the physicians' services industry, doctors of osteopathy are the only "full line" competitors of medical doctors. Given the current interest in merger of the two schools of practice, this Article examines the benefits of having an independent osteopathic school. These benefits include: (1) reduction of the monopoly power of medical doctors in malpractice litigation, fee negotiations with third party payors and the formulation of health policy; (2) greater satisfaction of consumer desires; and (3) diversity and innovation in physicians' training and methods of practice. The Article concludes that society has an interest in discouraging merger of the two groups; osteopathy should be maintained as an independent school of practice. To this end, society should carefully consider the impact of legislation and regulatory policies that may have the unintended effect of eliminating osteopathy as an independent competitor.

摘要

在医师服务行业中,整骨疗法医生是医学博士唯一的“全线”竞争对手。鉴于当前对这两种执业流派合并的关注,本文探讨了拥有一所独立整骨疗法学校的益处。这些益处包括:(1)在医疗事故诉讼、与第三方支付方的费用谈判以及健康政策制定方面,减少医学博士的垄断权力;(2)更大程度地满足消费者需求;(3)医师培训和执业方法的多样性与创新性。本文得出结论,社会有兴趣阻止这两个群体的合并;整骨疗法应作为一个独立的执业流派予以保留。为此,社会应仔细考虑立法和监管政策可能产生的意外影响,即消除整骨疗法作为独立竞争对手的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验