Roquefeuil B, Blanchet P, Batier C, Benezech J
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1982;1(6):649-54. doi: 10.1016/s0750-7658(82)80109-3.
Intractable pain in four patients enduring disseminated cancer was treated by intraventricular morphine. For all these patients, previous efficiency of opiates therapy had been assessed by a positive trial of epidural injections of morphine. The latter method had to be stopped and a switch to intraventricular morphine was motivated in three cases by a local non-tolerance to the subarachnoid catheter. In one case, an intraventricular system was inserted at the first onset. In all cases, the intraventricular system consisted of a Holter type device, using a reservoir subcutaneously implanted in the frontal scalp and connected at right-angle with a catheter inserted in the lateral ventricle. Trial times were respectively of eight days, one month, two months and seven months, with a self administration system in one case. In comparison with the epidural and lumbar intrathecal administration of morphine, the authors insist upon the quality of analgesia obtained, the absence of respiratory depression, the comfort and minimal daily quantities of morphine injected (inferior to one mg daily in three cases). Enlightened by these four cases, the authors also discuss of relative importance of the spinal and brain mechanisms involved in morphine analgesia.
对4例患有播散性癌症的患者采用脑室内注射吗啡治疗顽固性疼痛。对于所有这些患者,之前阿片类药物治疗的有效性已通过硬膜外注射吗啡的阳性试验进行评估。在3例患者中,由于对蛛网膜下腔导管出现局部不耐受,不得不停止后一种方法并改用脑室内注射吗啡。在1例患者中,在首次发病时就植入了脑室内系统。在所有病例中,脑室内系统均由一个动态心电图记录仪类型的装置组成,该装置使用皮下植入额部头皮的储液器,并与插入侧脑室的导管呈直角连接。试验时间分别为8天、1个月、2个月和7个月,其中1例采用自我给药系统。与硬膜外和腰段鞘内注射吗啡相比,作者强调所获得的镇痛质量、无呼吸抑制、舒适度以及每日注射吗啡的最小量(3例患者中每日小于1毫克)。受这4例病例的启发,作者还讨论了吗啡镇痛中脊髓和脑机制的相对重要性。