Suppr超能文献

实验性肾创伤中动脉造影、静脉造影和肾盂造影的比较。

Comparison of arteriography, venography, and pyelography in experimental renal trauma.

作者信息

Wynn W W, Ricketts H J, McRoberts J W, Ragde H

出版信息

Invest Urol. 1978 Jul;16(1):62-6.

PMID:689840
Abstract

Experimentally produced renal injuries are shown by arteriography, venography, and retrograde pyelography using geometric magnification techniques. Arteriography is the most satisfactory modality examined. Venography is technically more difficult and generally less sensitive than arteriography, although extravasation of contrast material was shown with equal frequency. Retrograde pyelography is inferior to arteriography and correlates closely with the venographic findings.

摘要

通过使用几何放大技术的动脉造影、静脉造影和逆行肾盂造影来显示实验性产生的肾损伤。动脉造影是所检查的最令人满意的方式。静脉造影在技术上更困难,并且通常比动脉造影敏感性更低,尽管造影剂外渗的显示频率相同。逆行肾盂造影不如动脉造影,并且与静脉造影结果密切相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验