Mamoli B, Sporn B, Steinbereithner K, Dal-Bianco P
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr Grenzgeb. 1980 Jun;48(6):314-23. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1002388.
The value of the quantitative electromyogram in the detection of subclinical myopathic signs was tested in a family consisting of 11 members, one of them showing a Malignant Hyperthermia crisis. Furtheron an in vitro contracture test and an ATP-test was performed and the Serum CPK and the isoenzyme in serum and muscle examined. The following conclusions were taken: 1) Although unspecific pattern (in 5 cases more than 12% polyphasic potentials were found, one of them showing a reduction of the mean duration of 30%) the electromyography is a good but not absolutely certain indicator of subclinical myopathic signs in Malignant Hyperthermia. 2) The exclusion of M.H. risk is not possible using a single test. 3) The diagnostic value of not invasive methods, as the electromyography is of special importance. The diagnostic use of many M.H. tests seems necessary.
在一个由11名成员组成的家庭中,对定量肌电图在检测亚临床肌病体征方面的价值进行了测试,其中一名成员出现恶性高热危象。此外,还进行了体外挛缩试验和ATP试验,并检测了血清肌酸磷酸激酶以及血清和肌肉中的同工酶。得出以下结论:1)尽管存在非特异性模式(5例中发现多相电位超过12%,其中1例平均时限缩短30%),但肌电图仍是恶性高热中亚临床肌病体征的良好但并非绝对可靠的指标。2)仅使用单一检测方法无法排除恶性高热风险。3)作为非侵入性方法,肌电图的诊断价值尤为重要。似乎有必要使用多种恶性高热检测方法进行诊断。