• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向博士论文的学术性:一个分析模型。

Toward scholarliness in doctoral dissertations: an analytical model.

作者信息

Meleis A I, Wilson H S, Chater S

出版信息

Res Nurs Health. 1980 Sep;3(3):115-24. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770030306.

DOI:10.1002/nur.4770030306
PMID:6904056
Abstract

The dissertation is one of the most important vehicles for providing the novice researcher with the necessary socialization for a future of productive and scholarly research activities. Research productivity and the scholarliness of research are needed in developing nursing science. In this article, the processes that have the potential to enhance the quality of the doctoral dissertation are addressed; the psychological, social, and structural processes involved in completing a quality dissertation are delineated and discussed; and a model for the development of scholarliness and scholarship in doctoral programs is presented. The authors address three major areas for consideration: (a) the dependence of scholarship and scholarliness on researchable questions that are important, evolve in the context of theoretical considerations, and improve the scientific base of nursing knowledge; (b) the development of these qualities as enhanced by the resolution of several dilemmas that revolve around decisions made throughout the dissertation process; and (c) the recomendation that these qualities (scholarship and scholarliness) be fostered meticulously during doctoral education in nursing and, preferably, earlier.

摘要

论文是为新手研究者提供必要的社会化过程,以使其未来能开展富有成效的学术研究活动的最重要工具之一。发展护理科学需要研究生产力和研究的学术性。本文探讨了有可能提高博士论文质量的过程;阐述并讨论了完成高质量论文所涉及的心理、社会和结构过程;并提出了一个博士项目中学术性和学术发展的模型。作者探讨了三个主要需要考虑的方面:(a)学术性和学术水平对重要的、在理论考量背景下演变且能改善护理知识科学基础的可研究问题的依赖性;(b)通过解决围绕论文过程中所做决策的几个困境来提升这些品质;(c)建议在护理博士教育期间,最好更早地精心培养这些品质(学术性和学术水平)。

相似文献

1
Toward scholarliness in doctoral dissertations: an analytical model.迈向博士论文的学术性:一个分析模型。
Res Nurs Health. 1980 Sep;3(3):115-24. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770030306.
2
Rigor in PhD dissertation research.博士论文研究的严谨性。
Nurs Forum. 2020 Nov;55(4):611-620. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12477. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
3
The Companion Dissertation: Enriching the Doctoral Experience.配套论文:丰富博士经历。
J Nurs Educ. 2017 Sep 1;56(9):564-566. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20170817-10.
4
On the way to scholarship: from master's to doctorate.在通往奖学金的道路上:从硕士到博士。
J Prof Nurs. 1992 Nov-Dec;8(6):328-34. doi: 10.1016/8755-7223(92)90095-g.
5
Three key components to successfully completing a nursing doctoral program.
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2007 Mar-Apr;38(2):76-82. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20070301-01.
6
Scholarly caring in doctoral nursing education: promoting diversity and collaborative mentorship.博士护理教育中的学术关怀:促进多样性与协作指导
Image J Nurs Sch. 1994 Fall;26(3):177-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1994.tb00309.x.
7
Innovative options for the doctoral dissertation in nursing.护理学博士论文的创新选择。
Nurs Outlook. 2008 Jul-Aug;56(4):174-8. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2008.03.004.
8
Assessment of the Impact of Teaching Demands on Research Productivity Among Doctoral Nursing Program Faculty.评估教学要求对护理学博士项目教员研究生产力的影响。
J Prof Nurs. 2016 May-Jun;32(3):180-92. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
9
Nursing theory and knowledge development: a descriptive review of doctoral dissertations, 2000-2004.护理理论与知识发展:对2000 - 2004年博士论文的描述性综述
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2007 Jan-Mar;30(1):E1-14. doi: 10.1097/00012272-200701000-00010.
10
Issues in dissertation proposal development.博士论文开题报告撰写中的问题。
NLN Publ. 1990(15-2285):345-51.

引用本文的文献

1
Practicing nurses perspectives of clinical scholarship: a qualitative study.执业护士对临床学术研究的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Nurs. 2013 Sep 25;12(1):21. doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-12-21.
2
Marking out the clinical expert/clinical leader/clinical scholar: perspectives from nurses in the clinical arena.标记临床专家/临床领袖/临床学者:来自临床领域护士的观点。
BMC Nurs. 2013 Apr 15;12:12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-12-12. eCollection 2013.