Lazarus R S
J Human Stress. 1978 Sep;4(3):35-40. doi: 10.1080/0097840X.1978.9934994.
Stress-related research has thus far failed to provide an adequate understanding of hypertension and other psychosomatic ailments for three main reasons: First, there has been a continual failure to view stress as a relational phenomenon, that is, as a particular kind of transaction between person and environment. Second, there has been much confusion about the social, psychological and physiological levels of stress analysis; each is to some extent independent of the other, so that what happens at one level cannot stand for what happens at another. Third, the predominant research model has been structural and static. That is, the researcher looks at some environmental or personality characteristic, treating it as a stable property, and attempts to relate it to the risk of hypertension across persons or groups. Such an approach overlooks the key social, psychological and physiological mediating processes (e.g., social supports, cognitive appraisals, and coping) that are concurrent with and have causal significance in blood pressure elevation or change. Structural research models need to be supplemented with process-oriented ones in which the same persons are observed across various adaptational encounters and over time.
迄今为止,与压力相关的研究未能充分理解高血压和其他身心疾病,主要有三个原因:第一,一直未能将压力视为一种关系现象,也就是说,未能将其视为个人与环境之间的一种特殊互动。第二,在压力分析的社会、心理和生理层面存在诸多混淆;每个层面在某种程度上都是相互独立的,因此一个层面发生的事情不能代表另一个层面发生的事情。第三,主要的研究模型是结构性的和静态的。也就是说,研究人员着眼于某些环境或人格特征,将其视为一种稳定的属性,并试图将其与不同个体或群体患高血压的风险联系起来。这种方法忽视了与血压升高或变化同时发生且具有因果意义的关键社会、心理和生理中介过程(如社会支持、认知评估和应对)。结构性研究模型需要辅以面向过程的模型,在这种模型中,对同一批人在不同的适应情境中以及随时间进行观察。