Pecoraro R E, Chen M S, Porte D
Diabetes Care. 1982 Nov-Dec;5(6):592-9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.5.6.592.
Interpreting measurements of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and glycosylated hemoglobin (GHb) is subject to inherent limitations. The time course of change in GHb cannot be reliably specified in the individual patient, nor do single measurements of GHb convey any information regarding recent change or stability in glycemic control. To evaluate whether the clinical utility of these measurements may be extended, sequential measurements of FPG and GHb were examined from 16 outpatients with NIDDM followed over periods of 12 successive weeks or longer, including intervals following cessation of prior therapy or initiation of new hypoglycemic therapy with glipizide. In some individuals as well as groups of patients, changes in GHb followed patterns previously described by mean changes among groups of patients. Differing from those patterns, however, other individuals demonstrated prompt improvement in GHb following substantial improvement in FPG, confirming that patterns of change described from group means do not apply to all circumstances of changing glycemic control, though they may represent the most common. By using measurements of both FPG and GHb obtained on a single occasion to calculate a third parameter, called the glycosylated hemoglobin index (GHb-1), accurate information could be obtained regarding changes in glycemic control which occurred over intervals of 1-4 wk prior to the measurements. By this approach the utility of GHb measurements in the management of outpatients with NIDDM may be extended beyond retrospective description of the "average" prior metabolic control to include assessment of recent changes in glycemia, either deterioration or improvement.
解读空腹血糖(FPG)和糖化血红蛋白(GHb)的测量结果存在固有限制。在个体患者中,GHb变化的时间进程无法可靠确定,单次GHb测量也无法传达有关血糖控制近期变化或稳定性的任何信息。为了评估这些测量方法的临床效用是否可以扩展,我们对16名非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(NIDDM)门诊患者进行了连续12周或更长时间的随访,检测了他们的FPG和GHb的连续测量值,包括在停止先前治疗或开始使用格列吡嗪进行新的降糖治疗后的时间段。在一些个体以及患者组中,GHb的变化遵循先前患者组平均变化所描述的模式。然而,与这些模式不同的是,其他个体在FPG大幅改善后,GHb迅速改善,这证实了从组均值描述的变化模式并不适用于血糖控制变化的所有情况,尽管它们可能代表了最常见的情况。通过使用在单次测量中获得的FPG和GHb测量值来计算第三个参数,即糖化血红蛋白指数(GHb-1),可以获得有关在测量前1 - 4周期间发生的血糖控制变化的准确信息。通过这种方法,GHb测量在NIDDM门诊患者管理中的效用可能会从回顾性描述“平均”先前代谢控制扩展到包括评估近期血糖的恶化或改善情况。