DeLustro F, Haskill J S
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1980 Jan;64(1):125-30.
The immunogenicities of irradiated T1699 murine mammary adenocarcinoma cells (XR-T1699) and mitomycin C-treated T1699 cells (T1699m) were compared with respect to eliciting humoral immunity, cell-mediated immunity, and protection against subsequent sc challenge with untreated T1699 tumor cells (T1699u) in the syngeneic host (DBA/2 mice). Treatment with 10(3)-10(7) T1699m failed to induce any immunity against subsequent challenge with viable T1699u, whereas 10(6)-10(7) XR-T1699 sensitized the host to later challenge with T1699u. Although both T1699m- and XR-T1699-sensitized mice displayed a delayed hypersensitivity response to soluble T1699 antigen as determined by footpad swelling, only XR-T1699-immunized mice developed detectable levels of anti-T1699 antibody, as measured by indirect immunofluorescence. The antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) titer of sera from XR-T1699-immunized mice peaked at day 11 and declined by day 20, whereas sera from T1699m- sensitized mice showed no detectable ADCC activity. Sera from mice with progressing T1699u tumors showed high levels of ADCC activity at all times tested. The immunity induced by XR-T1699 injection was shown to be specific for T1699 tumor cells and not limited to the anatomic area of immunization. The results are discussed in terms of the role of antibody as the primary protective mechanism in sensitization in the T1699 tumor model.
在同基因宿主(DBA/2小鼠)中,就引发体液免疫、细胞介导免疫以及抵抗随后未处理的T1699肿瘤细胞(T1699u)皮下攻击的保护作用而言,对经辐照的T1699小鼠乳腺腺癌细胞(XR-T1699)和经丝裂霉素C处理的T1699细胞(T1699m)的免疫原性进行了比较。用10³ - 10⁷个T1699m处理未能诱导对随后活T1699u攻击的任何免疫,而10⁶ - 10⁷个XR-T1699使宿主对后来的T1699u攻击敏感。尽管T1699m和XR-T1699致敏的小鼠通过足垫肿胀测定对可溶性T1699抗原均表现出迟发型超敏反应,但只有经XR-T1699免疫的小鼠通过间接免疫荧光测定产生了可检测水平的抗T1699抗体。经XR-T1699免疫的小鼠血清的抗体依赖性细胞毒性(ADCC)效价在第11天达到峰值,并在第20天下降,而T1699m致敏的小鼠血清未显示可检测到的ADCC活性。在所有测试时间点,患有进展性T1699u肿瘤的小鼠血清均显示出高水平的ADCC活性。XR-T1699注射诱导的免疫显示对T1699肿瘤细胞具有特异性,且不限于免疫的解剖区域。根据抗体作为T1699肿瘤模型致敏中的主要保护机制的作用对结果进行了讨论。