Suppr超能文献

Begg 疗法第一阶段中普通弓丝与多曲唇弓丝的比较。

A comparison of plain versus multilooped arch wires in stage I of Begg therapy.

作者信息

Kuftinec M M, Inman G O

出版信息

Am J Orthod. 1980 Jul;78(1):81-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(80)90041-x.

Abstract

In order to overcome the reportedly undesirable side effects of using multilooped arch wires in initial stages of Begg mechanotherapy, a clinical study was conducted in which treatment procedure was modified for the mandibular arch in one group of patients, who received nonlooped or plain mandibular arch wires. This group was closely matched with respect to age, sex, severity of malocclusion, and particularly the amount of anterior mandibular crowding with a group of patients who received multilooped arch wires designed very closely according to the classically prescribed methods. Comparison of the two groups by means of cephalometric measurements of the mandibular incisors at the end of Stage I of treatment demonstrated that the IMPA increased significantly more (p = 0.01) in the multilooped arch wire group. The over-all treatment time was not significantly different in the two groups, although it took longer to resolve the anterior mandibular crowding when plain wires were used. On the basis of this study, it would appear that the use of plain rather than multilooped arch wires in the mandibular arch deserves a favorable consideration in early Begg therapy.

摘要

为了克服在Begg矫治技术初始阶段使用多曲唇弓丝据报道出现的不良副作用,进行了一项临床研究,其中一组患者的下颌弓治疗程序进行了修改,这些患者使用无曲或平的下颌弓丝。该组在年龄、性别、错牙合严重程度,特别是下颌前部拥挤量方面与另一组患者进行了密切匹配,另一组患者使用根据经典规定方法非常紧密设计的多曲唇弓丝。在治疗第一阶段结束时通过对下颌切牙的头影测量对两组进行比较,结果表明多曲唇弓丝组的下切牙-下颌平面角(IMPA)显著增加更多(p = 0.01)。两组的总体治疗时间没有显著差异,尽管使用平弓丝时解决下颌前部拥挤所需的时间更长。基于这项研究,在下颌弓中使用平弓丝而非多曲唇弓丝在早期Begg治疗中似乎值得优先考虑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验