Ashton G C
Am J Hum Genet. 1980 Jul;32(4):601-13.
The Hawaii Family Study of Cognition provided an opportunity to investigate the frequency and implications of non-agreement, or mismatches, between observed and expected genetic marker phenotypes of husbands, wives, and children. Mismatch data from 68 families in which one or both spouses were known not to be a biological parent were used to determine the rate of undeclared nonparentage in 1,748 families in which conventional relationships were claimed. Two independent approaches gave consistent estimates, suggesting that approximately 2.3% of the 2,839 tested children from these families were probably the result of infidelity, concealed adoption, or another event. About two-thirds of the mismatches detected were probably due to properties of the techniques employed.
夏威夷认知家庭研究提供了一个机会,用以调查丈夫、妻子和孩子观察到的与预期的基因标记表型之间不一致或不匹配的频率及影响。来自68个家庭的不匹配数据(其中已知一方或双方配偶不是生物学父母)被用于确定1748个声称存在传统亲属关系家庭中未申报非亲子关系的比例。两种独立的方法给出了一致的估计结果,表明这些家庭中2839名接受检测的儿童中约2.3%可能是不忠、隐瞒收养或其他事件导致的。检测到的不匹配情况中约三分之二可能归因于所采用技术的特性。