• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluating pedigree data. I. The estimation of pedigree error in the presence of marker mistyping.评估系谱数据。I. 存在标记误分型时系谱误差的估计。
Am J Hum Genet. 1983 Mar;35(2):241-62.
2
Evaluating pedigree data. II. Identifying the cause of error in families with inconsistencies.评估系谱数据。II. 识别存在不一致情况的家族中的错误原因。
Hum Hered. 1983;33(6):377-89. doi: 10.1159/000153406.
3
Estimating the frequency of nonpaternity in Switzerland.估算瑞士非亲生父亲的比例。
Hum Hered. 1994 Nov-Dec;44(6):337-43. doi: 10.1159/000154241.
4
Probability of detection of genotyping errors and mutations as inheritance inconsistencies in nuclear-family data.在核心家系数据中,将基因分型错误和突变检测为遗传不一致的概率。
Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Feb;70(2):487-95. doi: 10.1086/338919. Epub 2002 Jan 8.
5
Identifying marker typing incompatibilities in linkage analysis.在连锁分析中识别标记分型不相容性。
Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Oct;59(4):946-50.
6
Paternity exclusion power: comparative behaviour of autosomal and X-chromosomal markers in standard and deficient cases with inbreeding.父权排除力:常染色体和 X 染色体标记在近亲繁殖标准和不足案例中的比较行为。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2013 Feb;7(2):290-5. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.12.002. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
7
Detection and integration of genotyping errors in statistical genetics.统计遗传学中基因分型错误的检测与整合
Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Feb;70(2):496-508. doi: 10.1086/338920. Epub 2002 Jan 8.
8
Improved maximum likelihood reconstruction of complex multi-generational pedigrees.复杂多代系谱的改进最大似然重建。
Theor Popul Biol. 2014 Nov;97:11-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2014.07.002. Epub 2014 Aug 10.
9
Comparative study of multipoint methods for genotype error detection.基因型错误检测多点方法的比较研究
Hum Hered. 2004;58(3-4):175-89. doi: 10.1159/000083545.
10
Comparisons of three probability formulae for parentage exclusion.三种亲权排除概率公式的比较。
Anim Genet. 1997 Dec;28(6):397-400. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.1997.00186.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Rules for resolving Mendelian inconsistencies in nuclear pedigrees typed for two-allele markers.解决双等位基因标记分型的核系谱中孟德尔不一致性的规则。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 2;12(3):e0172807. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172807. eCollection 2017.
2
Detection of Mendelian consistent genotyping errors in pedigrees.家系中孟德尔一致基因分型错误的检测。
Genet Epidemiol. 2014 May;38(4):291-9. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21806. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
3
Estimating the prevalence of nonpaternity in Germany.估算德国的非亲生父亲比例。
Hum Nat. 2012 Jun;23(2):208-17. doi: 10.1007/s12110-012-9143-y.
4
Measuring paternal discrepancy and its public health consequences.测量父系差异及其对公共卫生的影响。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Sep;59(9):749-54. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.036517.
5
A high-density screen for linkage in multiple sclerosis.一项针对多发性硬化症连锁反应的高密度筛查。
Am J Hum Genet. 2005 Sep;77(3):454-67. doi: 10.1086/444547. Epub 2005 Jul 29.
6
Detection and integration of genotyping errors in statistical genetics.统计遗传学中基因分型错误的检测与整合
Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Feb;70(2):496-508. doi: 10.1086/338920. Epub 2002 Jan 8.
7
A genomewide screen for autism: strong evidence for linkage to chromosomes 2q, 7q, and 16p.一项针对自闭症的全基因组筛查:与2号染色体长臂、7号染色体长臂及16号染色体短臂连锁的有力证据。
Am J Hum Genet. 2001 Sep;69(3):570-81. doi: 10.1086/323264. Epub 2001 Jul 30.
8
Family history and DNA analysis in patients with suspected Huntington's disease.疑似亨廷顿舞蹈症患者的家族病史及DNA分析
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000 Jul;69(1):54-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.69.1.54.
9
A multipoint method for detecting genotyping errors and mutations in sibling-pair linkage data.一种用于检测同胞对连锁数据中基因分型错误和突变的多点方法。
Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Apr;66(4):1287-97. doi: 10.1086/302861. Epub 2000 Mar 28.
10
Linkage analysis in the presence of errors III: marker loci and their map as nuisance parameters.存在误差情况下的连锁分析III:作为干扰参数的标记位点及其图谱
Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Apr;66(4):1298-309. doi: 10.1086/302846. Epub 2000 Mar 23.

本文引用的文献

1
On the Estimation of the Frequency of Nonpaternity.关于非父系频率的估计
Am J Hum Genet. 1963 Jun;15(2):191-202.
2
A note on the detection of interchanged children.关于互换儿童检测的说明。
Am J Hum Genet. 1951 Dec;3(4):362-75.
3
Standard calculations for evaluating a blood-group system.评估血型系统的标准计算方法。
Heredity (Edinb). 1951 Apr;5(1):95-102. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1951.5.
4
Tables and nomogram for calculating chances of excluding paternity.用于计算排除亲子关系几率的表格和列线图。
Am J Hum Genet. 1954 Dec;6(4):426-33.
5
STUDIES ON THE XAVANTE INDIANS OF THE BRAZILIAN MATO GROSSO.关于巴西马托格罗索州沙万特印第安人的研究。
Am J Hum Genet. 1964 Mar;16(1):52-140.
6
Probability calculations in pedigrees under complex modes of inheritance.复杂遗传模式下家系中的概率计算。
Hum Hered. 1980;30(5):320-3. doi: 10.1159/000153150.
7
Mismatches in genetic markers in a large family study.一项大型家族研究中基因标记的不匹配情况。
Am J Hum Genet. 1980 Jul;32(4):601-13.
8
Exclusions and attributions of paternity: practical experiences of forensic genetics and statistics.父系排除与认定:法医遗传学与统计学的实践经验
Am J Hum Genet. 1980 May;32(3):420-31.
9
Maximum-likelihood estimation of the proportion of nonpaternity.非父权比例的最大似然估计
Am J Hum Genet. 1965 Nov;17(6):480-94.
10
A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data.家系数据遗传分析的通用模型。
Hum Hered. 1971;21(6):523-42. doi: 10.1159/000152448.

评估系谱数据。I. 存在标记误分型时系谱误差的估计。

Evaluating pedigree data. I. The estimation of pedigree error in the presence of marker mistyping.

作者信息

Lathrop G M, Hooper A B, Huntsman J W, Ward R H

出版信息

Am J Hum Genet. 1983 Mar;35(2):241-62.

PMID:6573130
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1685535/
Abstract

Pedigrees used in the analysis of genetic or medical data are usually ascertained from sources subject to a variety of errors including misidentification of individuals, faults in historical documents or record linkage, nonpaternity, and unidentified adoption. Genetic markers can be used to verify putative family and pedigree data through the search for inconsistencies, or genetic exclusions, between putative parents and offspring. The probability of observing an exclusion given the occurrence of an error depends upon the gene frequencies at the loci under study and the forms of error. In addition, inconsistencies can arise from laboratory errors in marker determination. Together, these problems make the proper statistical analysis of such data desirable. Here we give a model that specifies the combined effects of various kinds of pedigree error along with genetic marker error. This model allows the maximum-likelihood estimation of the rates of various forms of pedigree error and laboratory error from genetic marker data collected on putative families. The method is illustrated by applying it to data obtained from a South Pacific island population, Tokelau. From the observed distribution of genetic marker inconsistencies between the parents and offspring of putative families, derived from the extensive genealogy of this population, we are able to estimate that the error of a paternal link is 4%, the error of a maternal link is zero, and the overall system typing error is 1%.

摘要

用于遗传或医学数据分析的系谱通常是从可能存在各种错误的来源确定的,这些错误包括个体身份识别错误、历史文献或记录链接中的错误、非父系关系以及未识别的收养情况。遗传标记可用于通过查找推定父母与后代之间的不一致或遗传排除来验证推定的家庭和系谱数据。给定错误发生时观察到排除的概率取决于所研究基因座的基因频率以及错误的形式。此外,标记测定中的实验室错误也可能导致不一致。总之,这些问题使得对这类数据进行适当的统计分析变得很有必要。在此,我们给出一个模型,该模型规定了各种系谱错误以及遗传标记错误的综合影响。这个模型允许从在推定家庭中收集的遗传标记数据中对各种形式的系谱错误和实验室错误发生率进行最大似然估计。通过将该方法应用于从南太平洋岛屿托克劳人群获得的数据来说明该方法。从这个人群广泛的家谱中得出的推定家庭父母与后代之间遗传标记不一致的观察分布,我们能够估计父系链接的错误率为4%,母系链接的错误率为零,总体系统分型错误率为1%。