Byar D P
Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1980;55:113-6.
In the first Veteran's Administration Cooperative Urological Research Group (VACURG) study all stage I and II patients were assigned to radical prostatectomy and were randomized to either placebo or 5 mg diethylstilbestrol (DES) daily by mouth. Results indicated worse survival in those treated with DES in stage I, but there was no difference in stage II. In Study 2, stage I and II patients were randomly assigned to either placebo or placebo plus radical prostatectomy. An analysis based upon time to progression failed to show a significant advantage for radical prostatectomy. Both the size of the primary lesion at diagnosis and the histological grade of the tumor using the Gleason system were related to the probability of progression.
在退伍军人管理局合作泌尿外科研究组(VACURG)的第一项研究中,所有I期和II期患者均被分配接受根治性前列腺切除术,并被随机分为口服安慰剂组或每日口服5毫克己烯雌酚(DES)组。结果表明,I期接受DES治疗的患者生存率较差,但II期患者无差异。在研究2中,I期和II期患者被随机分配接受安慰剂或安慰剂加根治性前列腺切除术。基于疾病进展时间的分析未能显示根治性前列腺切除术有显著优势。诊断时原发灶的大小以及使用Gleason系统评估的肿瘤组织学分级均与疾病进展的可能性相关。