Wei S H, Ngan P W, Wefel J S, Kerber P
J Dent Res. 1981 Jul;60(7):1297-300. doi: 10.1177/00220345810600070201.
The fluoride (F) uptake from two commercial prophylaxis pastes and a newly formulated prophylaxis paste was compared. The enamel fluoride uptake of 26 extracted sound human molars was measured using an acid etch biopsy method. The F uptakes in ppm (mean +/- SEM) for the control prophy pastes (C), Zircate treatment paste (Z), an APF paste (Nuppro,A), and a new experimental paste (N) were 1145 +/- 65,1245 +/- 72,1857 +/- 296, and 1841 +/- 321, respectively. The enamel biopsy depths in micrometers (mean +/- S.D.) for the control, Zircate APF pastes, and Newpaste were 6.64 +/- 1.75, 7.4 +/- 2.32, 6.55 +/- 2.23 and 7.69 +/- 1.80. The Newpaste appeared to give a significantly higher fluride uptake than Zircate and control pastes, but was very similar to an APF paste.
比较了两种市售预防用糊剂和一种新配制的预防用糊剂的氟摄取情况。使用酸蚀活检法测量了26颗拔除的健康人磨牙的牙釉质氟摄取量。对照预防用糊剂（C）、锆酸盐治疗糊剂（Z）、一种酸性磷酸氟糊剂（Nuppro，A）和一种新的实验性糊剂（N）的氟摄取量（以ppm计，平均值±标准误）分别为1145±65、1245±72、1857±296和1841±321。对照糊剂、锆酸盐酸性磷酸氟糊剂和新糊剂的牙釉质活检深度（以微米计，平均值±标准差）分别为6.64±1.75、7.4±2.32、6.55±2.23和7.69±1.80。新糊剂的氟摄取量似乎明显高于锆酸盐糊剂和对照糊剂，但与酸性磷酸氟糊剂非常相似。
