Yeh Chin-Hsuan, Wang Yung-Li, Vo Thi Thuy Tien, Lee Yi-Ching, Lee I-Ta
Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dentistry, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110301, Taiwan.
School of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan.
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Sep 8;13(17):2246. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13172246.
Dental caries remains one of the most prevalent chronic diseases worldwide. Fluoride has long been recognized as a cornerstone of caries prevention through enamel remineralization, inhibition of demineralization, and antibacterial activity. However, controversies persist regarding systemic exposure, potential health risks, and ethical debates over community water fluoridation. Previous reviews often focused on isolated interventions, whereas a critical synthesis of mechanisms, clinical efficacy, safety, and public health perspectives is still lacking. This narrative review synthesized peer-reviewed publications from 2000 to 2025 retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and leading dental journals. Emphasis was placed on randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and major policy documents. Evidence was thematically appraised across mechanisms of action, clinical applications, comparative efficacy, safety, and sociocultural considerations. Fluoride consistently shows preventive and therapeutic benefits across multiple delivery forms, including toothpaste, varnishes, mouthrinses, supplements, and silver diamine fluoride, with particular advantages for high-risk groups such as children, orthodontic patients, and older adults. Nonetheless, study heterogeneity, variations in protocols, and concerns regarding fluorosis and possible neurodevelopmental effects highlight persistent uncertainties. Comparative analyses reveal trade-offs between efficacy and acceptance, for example, the high caries-arrest rate of silver diamine fluoride compared with its esthetic drawback. Emerging alternatives such as nano-hydroxyapatite, fluoride-containing bioactive glass, and probiotic-based approaches are promising but currently supported by limited clinical data. Fluoride remains central to caries prevention, yet its optimal use requires balancing benefits against risks, addressing cultural and socioeconomic barriers, and tailoring strategies to individual and community contexts. This narrative synthesis underscores the need for well-designed multicenter randomized controlled trials, longitudinal studies to refine safe exposure thresholds, evaluations of novel biomaterials and delivery systems, and the incorporation of patient-reported outcomes to guide future evidence-based policies and clinical practices.
龋齿仍然是全球最普遍的慢性病之一。长期以来,氟化物一直被视为预防龋齿的基石,它可以通过牙釉质再矿化、抑制脱矿和抗菌活性来预防龋齿。然而,关于全身暴露、潜在健康风险以及社区水氟化的伦理辩论仍存在争议。以往的综述往往侧重于孤立的干预措施,而在机制、临床疗效、安全性和公共卫生视角的批判性综合方面仍然欠缺。本叙述性综述综合了2000年至2025年从PubMed、Scopus、科学网和主要牙科期刊中检索到的同行评议出版物。重点关注随机对照试验、系统评价、荟萃分析和主要政策文件。从作用机制、临床应用、比较疗效、安全性和社会文化考量等方面对证据进行了主题评估。氟化物在多种给药形式中均持续显示出预防和治疗益处,包括牙膏、氟漆、漱口水、补充剂和氟化银胺,对儿童、正畸患者和老年人等高风险人群具有特别优势。尽管如此,研究的异质性、方案的差异以及对氟斑牙和可能的神经发育影响的担忧凸显了持续存在的不确定性。比较分析揭示了疗效与可接受性之间的权衡,例如,氟化银胺的高龋齿抑制率与其美学缺陷之间的权衡。纳米羟基磷灰石、含氟生物活性玻璃和基于益生菌的方法等新兴替代品很有前景,但目前临床数据有限。氟化物仍然是预防龋齿的核心,但它的最佳使用需要在益处和风险之间取得平衡,解决文化和社会经济障碍,并根据个人和社区情况调整策略。本叙述性综述强调需要精心设计的多中心随机对照试验、纵向研究以完善安全暴露阈值、评估新型生物材料和给药系统,以及纳入患者报告的结果以指导未来基于证据的政策和临床实践。