Teo C S, Wise M D
J Oral Rehabil. 1981 Jun;8(4):363-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1981.tb00510.x.
The study reported compared the positions of the horizontal axis of rotation of the condyles when R.A.P. registrations were taken on seven subjects using; (1) An anterior jig with chinpoint guidance. (2) An anterior jig with chinpoint guidance and applied muscle force by the subject. (3) An anterior jig with bilateral manipulation (i.e. bilateral support of the body of the mandible by the operator). The results showed that the most superior positions were obtained with the technique using the anterior jig with chinpoint guidance and applied muscle force, which was also the most inconsistent technique. The technique using the anterior jig with chinpoint guidance was most consistent, and the mean difference between retruded axis position and intercuspal position using this technique was 0.31 mm on the right side and 0.34 mm on the left side.
该研究报告比较了在七名受试者身上进行R.A.P.记录时髁突水平旋转轴的位置,使用的方法有:(1) 带有颏点引导的前导架。(2) 带有颏点引导且受试者施加肌肉力量的前导架。(3) 带有双侧操作的前导架(即操作者对下颌体进行双侧支撑)。结果显示,使用带有颏点引导且受试者施加肌肉力量的技术获得的位置最靠上,而该技术也是最不稳定的技术。使用带有颏点引导的前导架的技术最稳定,使用该技术时,右侧后缩轴位置与牙尖交错位之间的平均差异为0.31毫米,左侧为0.34毫米。