• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对医生临床与医院利用绩效之间关系的考察。

An examination of the relationships between physicians' clinical and hospital-utilization performance.

作者信息

Saywell R M, Bean J A, Ludke R L, Redman R W, McHugh G J

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 1981 Fall;16(3):285-303.

PMID:6946048
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1072246/
Abstract

To examine the relationships between measures of attending physician teams' clinical and utilization performance, inpatient hospital audits were conducted in 22 Maryland and western Pennsylvania nonfederal short-term hospitals. A total of 6,980 medical records were abstracted from eight diagnostic categories using the Payne and JCAH PEP medical audit procedures. The results indicate weak statistical associations between the two medical care evaluation audits; between clinical performance and utilization performance, as measured by appropriateness of admissions and length of stay; and between three utilization measures. Based on these findings, it does not appear valid to use performance in one area to evaluate performance in the other in order to measure or evaluate and ultimately improve physicians; clinical or utilization performance.

摘要

为了研究主治医师团队的临床指标与医疗服务利用绩效之间的关系,我们对马里兰州和宾夕法尼亚州西部的22家非联邦短期医院进行了住院患者医院审计。我们使用佩恩和联合委员会认证计划(JCAH PEP)医疗审计程序,从八个诊断类别中提取了总共6980份病历。结果表明,两项医疗评估审计之间、临床绩效与医疗服务利用绩效(以入院适宜性和住院时间衡量)之间以及三项医疗服务利用指标之间的统计关联较弱。基于这些发现,为了衡量、评估并最终改善医生的临床或医疗服务利用绩效,利用一个领域的绩效来评估另一个领域的绩效似乎并不合理。

相似文献

1
An examination of the relationships between physicians' clinical and hospital-utilization performance.对医生临床与医院利用绩效之间关系的考察。
Health Serv Res. 1981 Fall;16(3):285-303.
2
A performance comparison: USMG-FMG attending physicians.一项绩效比较:美国医学院毕业生(USMG)与国际医学毕业生(FMG)主治医师
Am J Public Health. 1979 Jan;69(1):57-62. doi: 10.2105/ajph.69.1.57.
3
A performance comparison: USMG-FMG house staff physicians.一项绩效比较:美国医学院毕业生(USMG)与外国医学院毕业生(FMG)的住院医师。
Am J Public Health. 1980 Jan;70(1):23-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.70.1.23.
4
Comparing medical audits: correlation, scaling, and sensitivity.比较医学审计:相关性、缩放和敏感性。
J Med Educ. 1978 Jun;53(6):480-6.
5
Medical staff: what should trigger a focused review?医务人员:什么应该引发一次重点评估?
Hosp Peer Rev. 2007 Oct;32(10):137-8, 143.
6
New JCAH standards affect medical staff, quality assurance.新的医疗组织联合评审委员会标准影响医务人员和质量保证。
Health Prog. 1984 Nov;65(10):38-43.
7
Physician in a hospital setting.
Leg Med. 1985:323-33.
8
The real deal on holding successful case reviews.关于成功进行病例回顾的实际要点。
Hosp Peer Rev. 2007 Oct;32(10):145-8.
9
Quality assurance: debate persists on goals, impact, and methods of evaluating care.质量保证:关于评估医疗护理的目标、影响和方法的争论仍在继续。
Hospitals. 1979 Apr 1;53(7):163-7.
10
Quality assessment and quality assurance in medical care.
Annu Rev Public Health. 1980;1:37-68. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.01.050180.000345.

本文引用的文献

1
Physician performance and its effects on patients: a classification based on reports by internists, surgeons, pediatricians, and obstetricians.
Med Care. 1970 Jul-Aug;8(4):299-308. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197008040-00006.
2
Evaluating the quality of medical care.评估医疗质量。
Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966 Jul;44(3):Suppl:166-206.
3
Evaluating quality of patient care. A strategy relating outcome and process assessment.
JAMA. 1971 Oct 25;218(4):564-9.
4
Interdiagnosis relationships of physician performance measures.医生绩效指标的相互诊断关系。
Med Care. 1974 Apr;12(4):369-74. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197404000-00009.
5
Studies of process--outcome correlations in medical care evaluations: a critique.医疗保健评估中过程-结果相关性的研究:一项批判性分析。
Med Care. 1978 Nov;16(11):907-30. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197811000-00002.