Suppr超能文献

医疗保健评估中过程-结果相关性的研究:一项批判性分析。

Studies of process--outcome correlations in medical care evaluations: a critique.

作者信息

McAuliffe W E

出版信息

Med Care. 1978 Nov;16(11):907-30. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197811000-00002.

Abstract

The validity of process evaluations of medical care has been challenged by a number of studies which purport to show that process and outcome measures are unrelated. However, each of the studies had numerous methodological flaws which biased their results against finding a relationship: either their outcome measures had questionable validity, their research designs were inappropriate, or the statistical analyses were poorly conceived. Better studies have found significant, although modest, correlations between process and outcome measures. Since the validity of outcome measures has never been determined, there is little reason at present for believing that outcome measures are more valid than process measures.

摘要

一些研究对医疗过程评估的有效性提出了质疑,这些研究旨在表明过程指标和结果指标并无关联。然而,每项研究都存在诸多方法上的缺陷,这些缺陷使研究结果偏向于无法发现两者之间的关系:要么其结果指标的有效性存疑,要么研究设计不当,要么统计分析构思欠佳。更优质的研究发现,过程指标和结果指标之间存在显著(尽管不太明显)的相关性。由于结果指标的有效性从未得到确定,目前几乎没有理由相信结果指标比过程指标更具有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验