Sewerin I
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1981 Apr;9(2):74-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1981.tb01032.x.
Twenty-two extracted human molars and premolars with a total of 34 initial proximal carious lesions were radiographed in 16 different views varying the horizontal angulation of the X-ray beam in steps of 2.5 degrees. The radiographs were read simultaneously by three observers. Clinical and radiographic diagnoses were compared. When utilizing all 16 views the concordance was 95%. All proximal surfaces were scored using four scoring classes. Surfaces without radiolucencies were scored 0, and carious surfaces were scored according to the extent of the radiolucencies. Nine sound and 12 carious surfaces were assigned identical scores in all 16 views, while 22 (65%) of the carious surfaces were assigned two, three or four different scores. Deviations from a direction of the X-ray beam tangential to the proximal surface eliciting a radiographic image belonging to a different score were measured. In 71% of the cases a deviation of 7.5 degrees or less elicited a different score. Projectional circumstances should be taken into consideration in interpreting proximal radiolucencies.
对22颗拔除的人类磨牙和前磨牙进行了X线摄影,这些牙齿共有34个初始邻面龋损,以2.5度为步长改变X射线束的水平角度,共拍摄了16个不同角度的影像。三位观察者同时阅读这些X线片。比较了临床诊断和影像学诊断。当使用全部16个角度的影像时,一致性为95%。所有邻面均使用四个评分等级进行评分。无透射影像的表面评分为0分,龋损表面根据透射影像的范围进行评分。在所有16个角度的影像中,9个健康表面和12个龋损表面被赋予相同的分数,而22个(65%)龋损表面被赋予了两个、三个或四个不同的分数。测量了X射线束方向与邻面切线方向的偏差,该偏差导致影像学图像属于不同的分数。在71%的病例中,7.5度或更小的偏差会导致不同的分数。在解释邻面透射影像时应考虑投照情况。