Suppr超能文献

超声器械与手动器械在清除龈下菌斑方面的比较。

Comparison of ultrasonic to hand instruments in the removal of subgingival plaque.

作者信息

Thornton S, Garnick J

出版信息

J Periodontol. 1982 Jan;53(1):35-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.1982.53.1.35.

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of hand and ultrasonic instrumentation in removing subgingival plaque. Twenty-four teeth in five patients were randomly assigned to be scaled by hand instruments, scaled by ultrasonic instruments, or uninstrumented as a control The subgingival tooth surface was delineated by a groove, and the teeth were then extracted for periodontal reasons. The percentage of plaque area relative to the total surface area of the side of the tooth was computed. No significant difference was found between the two methods in removing subgingival plaque. Furthermore, neither method removed all of the plaque.

摘要

本研究的主要目的是比较手工器械和超声器械在清除龈下菌斑方面的效果。将五名患者的24颗牙齿随机分为三组,分别使用手工器械进行洁治、使用超声器械进行洁治或不进行器械操作作为对照。用凹槽勾勒出龈下牙面,然后出于牙周原因将牙齿拔除。计算菌斑面积相对于牙齿侧面总面积的百分比。两种方法在清除龈下菌斑方面没有发现显著差异。此外,两种方法都没有清除所有菌斑。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验