Suppr超能文献

超声器械与手动器械在清除龈下菌斑方面的比较。

Comparison of ultrasonic to hand instruments in the removal of subgingival plaque.

作者信息

Thornton S, Garnick J

出版信息

J Periodontol. 1982 Jan;53(1):35-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.1982.53.1.35.

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of hand and ultrasonic instrumentation in removing subgingival plaque. Twenty-four teeth in five patients were randomly assigned to be scaled by hand instruments, scaled by ultrasonic instruments, or uninstrumented as a control The subgingival tooth surface was delineated by a groove, and the teeth were then extracted for periodontal reasons. The percentage of plaque area relative to the total surface area of the side of the tooth was computed. No significant difference was found between the two methods in removing subgingival plaque. Furthermore, neither method removed all of the plaque.

摘要

本研究的主要目的是比较手工器械和超声器械在清除龈下菌斑方面的效果。将五名患者的24颗牙齿随机分为三组,分别使用手工器械进行洁治、使用超声器械进行洁治或不进行器械操作作为对照。用凹槽勾勒出龈下牙面,然后出于牙周原因将牙齿拔除。计算菌斑面积相对于牙齿侧面总面积的百分比。两种方法在清除龈下菌斑方面没有发现显著差异。此外,两种方法都没有清除所有菌斑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验