Thornton S, Garnick J
J Periodontol. 1982 Jan;53(1):35-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.1982.53.1.35.
The primary objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of hand and ultrasonic instrumentation in removing subgingival plaque. Twenty-four teeth in five patients were randomly assigned to be scaled by hand instruments, scaled by ultrasonic instruments, or uninstrumented as a control The subgingival tooth surface was delineated by a groove, and the teeth were then extracted for periodontal reasons. The percentage of plaque area relative to the total surface area of the side of the tooth was computed. No significant difference was found between the two methods in removing subgingival plaque. Furthermore, neither method removed all of the plaque.
本研究的主要目的是比较手工器械和超声器械在清除龈下菌斑方面的效果。将五名患者的24颗牙齿随机分为三组,分别使用手工器械进行洁治、使用超声器械进行洁治或不进行器械操作作为对照。用凹槽勾勒出龈下牙面,然后出于牙周原因将牙齿拔除。计算菌斑面积相对于牙齿侧面总面积的百分比。两种方法在清除龈下菌斑方面没有发现显著差异。此外,两种方法都没有清除所有菌斑。